Purpose

For Freedom From Delusion Commentaries and Series go to : https://commentariesandseries.blogspot.com/


To Be Notified of New Posts, Please Click the “Follower” Notification Located Below the Blog Archive



Showing posts with label part 2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label part 2. Show all posts

Thursday, February 11, 2021

Gleanings From Enoch, Part 2



GLEANINGS FROM ENOCH, PART 2

 

by eternalissues@cox.net

Blog Post Date:  2-11-2021

 

I think part of what I love so much about Enoch is the glimmer we get to see of the other side, and the reminder that earth is merely the trial run.  Living here on earth, trudging through the days in and out of making a living, providing and protecting, nurturing and being nurtured, sometimes the eternal seems so surreal.

Section Three of Enoch is titled “The Astronomical Book”, and starts with chapter 72.  Most likely I will not adequately comment on the richness of this section – for it moved me beyond what I think I’m able to convey.  But I can’t help but wonder if we had set ourselves to learning according to the revelations of God versus the study of man, if our understanding and paradigm on earth would be very different than what it is in my lifetime?

I’m reminded of my hero George Washington Carver, and how his education was in the laboratory of nature with the instructor of the Holy Spirit.  If ever there was a humble man who emulated the divine inspiration for understanding nature and the elements of how this life was ordered, to me it is he. 

Enoch begins this section with a discourse on the path of the sun.  I suppose the possibility exists that it was allegorical, but I do not think so.  And if you don’t take his discourse allegorically or symbolically, your mind will likely tilt, because his description defies modern science.

To begin, he references the laws of the sun, moon and luminaries (stars).  Uriel is the host who is showing him such grand behind the scenes, and it is made plain the order is a natural law.  In fact, he says at the end of verse one,

“…and he [Uriel] showed me all their laws exactly as they are, and how it is with regard to all the years of the world and unto eternity, until the new creation is accomplished which endures until eternity.”

There is constant foreshadowing of a time after the time of earth.  Reading Enoch is an experience in learning of worlds that have been, worlds that are, and worlds that will be.  We almost have to leave behind preconceived ideology from the days of school rooms and lectures, and even the tidy lessons of Sunday School. 

Enoch calls the sun a luminary, and tells us the first law of the sun is “its rising in the eastern portals of the heaven, and its setting in the western portals of the heaven.”  Immediately we will have to consider that we have either been taught and/or believed a lie.  If the sun rises and sets out of portals of the heaven, then it is not stationary in the sky with globes revolving around it.

Enoch described six portals in both the eastern and western parts of the heaven, as well as multiple windows on each side of the portals.  He describes a sequence of days in which the sun departs one portal in the east, returns to one in the west for about thirty days, and then changes portals, which obviously shows the sun moves across the sky as the seasons progress.  It’s a fascinating depiction as it tells how the seasons move with the sun’s path, how the days get longer in some passages and shorter in others.

The chapter on the sun ends with:

“As he rises, so he sets and decreases not, and rests not, but runs day and night, and his light is sevenfold brighter than that of the moon; but as regards size they are both equal.”

When Enoch describes the moon’s course, he is very specific how the moon’s course runs separate from the sun’s, and how measuring time by the moon must take into account the discrepancies.  He explains that the moon falls behind the calendar record over eight years by eighty days.  And then he says something interesting, he addresses “world stations”.

I found some websites with people who have really taken some of these concepts Enoch shares and applied principles to them.  Here are a few I’d like to peruse sometime when I have more time:

Astronomy confirms the accuracy of the Book of Enoch

Revolutions of the Luminaries

Enoch and the still flat earth

What I also find interesting is that Enoch describes a year as 364 days (and as 52 weeks).  There are four intercalary days injected.  But it makes me wonder how off our calendars may or may not be from the variations over the millennia of measuring time into years….  For instance, if we failed to account for a year being 364 days by God’s calendar, just that one day over the course of 4000 years would make our calendars off by almost eleven years (10.9).  These are things that matter if we’re trying to keep God’s timetable.

Enoch segues into the course of the luminaries (stars) by explaining that the star courses set the intercalary days.  And then he says this fascinating thing (75:2):

“And owing to them men go wrong therein, for those luminaries truly render service on the world-stations, one in the first portal, one in the third portal of the heaven, one in the fourth portal, and one in the sixth portal, and the exactness of the year is accomplished through its separate three hundred and sixty-four stations.”

If we can temporarily set down our preconceived notions of the earth and its orbit around the sun, and just imagine, even if just to pretend, that Enoch’s descriptions are true, we find such fascinating courses of chariots and winds, windows and portals and world-stations. 

Remember when you read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe for the first time?  I remember how I had to lay aside the laws of this earth as I was taught them, to embrace the world of Narnia.  It was similar but not the same.  It had elements that did not fit with the principles I was taught of earth and life by my earliest teachers.  This reminds me of that.  I don’t necessarily have to discard the original teachings I have of these concepts, but if I just set them aside to entertain a different way of looking at them, I may be able to glean something I would otherwise miss.

Wind has always been a mysterious concept to me.  What causes it?  Where does it come from and what causes it?  I know science has their theories, but Enoch puts science on its heels.  Enoch tells us the winds are found in the twelve portals that open to the four quarters of the earth, and to find these portals you must go to the ends of the earth!

He describes the purposes of the winds, some for good, some for harm.  He assigns the plagues to the winds.  And then he moves into the quarters….

How does a round globe have four quarters?  Enoch says the quarters are also called the north, south, east, and west.  He tells us what each quarter holds, calling the second quarter most special because the Most High descends from it, and it is also called the south.  The northern quarter is subdivided into three parts, a part each for:  man, seas & land, and the “garden of righteousness”.

Then Enoch circled back to the sun and moon, and gave us their names (two for the sun and four for the moon) and their luminous abilities.  Enoch concludes this section with three chapters that I personally subtitled “the transgression”.  Here are some passages I found especially noteworthy:

[80:2)  “And in the days of the sinners the years will be shortened, and their seed will be tardy on their lands and fields, and all things on the earth will alter, and will not appear in their time.”

I grew up a farmer’s daughter.  I know that this is true even in my lifetime.

Enoch goes on in verse four to say, “And the moon will alter her order, and not appear at her time.”  This tells me the original discourse Enoch gave on the plight of the sun and moon through the portals will change.  Six thousand years later, I do believe it has changed.

Verse five tells us the sun will burn more brightly “than accords with the order of light”, and the following versus add:

“And many chiefs of the stars will transgress the order (prescribed).  And these will alter their orbits and tasks, and not appear at the seasons prescribed to them.  And the whole order of the stars will be concealed from the sinners, and the thoughts of those on the earth will err concerning them.”  (This gave me pause.  How much error is in our ways and interpretations?)

Enoch continues to hearken his son, Methuselah, (and future readers), to walk in the ways of righteousness and not depart from it.  We’re to teach the wisdom of heaven to our children and them to theirs, that the way not be lost.  He says in 82:3, “And those who understand it will not sleep but will listen with the ear that they may learn this wisdom…”

When Enoch goes on to explain the four luminaries that correct the calendar by their intercalary insertions, he admonishes:

“Owing to them men will be at fault and not reckon them in the whole reckoning of the year:  yea, men will be at fault, and not recognize them accurately.”  What point in the future was he prophesying about?   A hundred years?  A thousand?

 It’s as though Enoch looked forward through the passage of time and saw a future time that the wisdom given to him and made available by the faithful who passed it along through the millennia would hit a point that error would prevail to the detriment of those who profess to be knowing. 

If the descriptions of Enoch be true, then what we know as truth is a lie.  The earth does not spin on an axis and traverse in an orbit around a stationary sun.  That’s a difficult pill for most to swallow.  I do not portend to tell another what to think or what conclusions should be made.  I only wonder if the story has been obscured over time with the increasing wickedness of man and interference of the fallen spirits, and if there is a way to peel back the layers of fallacy to arise at honest truth that stems from the source of all Truth, God Himself.  To receive that, what must we be willing to lay down in our beliefs in order to embrace truths that contradict such? 

Surely it is not a salvation issue whether we believe the principles science and education have indoctrinated us with, or if we choose to believe ancient scripts from patriarchs of the faith.  I say that because I don’t think such topics are worth the division they cause.  They don’t impact our salvation.  Let people evaluate the data as they must, and arrive at the conclusions that their pursuit of truth leads them.  If it’s not a salvation issue, if it doesn’t deny the Lordship of Christ, let’s walk in grace toward one another.

That said, there are numerous passages of Scripture itself that indicate maybe our thoughts have been hijacked by the “reason of man”. 

Joshua 10:12-14  (NASU)

Then Joshua spoke to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the sons of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel,

"O sun, stand still at Gibeon, and O moon in the valley of Aijalon." So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, until the nation avenged themselves of their enemies.

Is it not written in the book of Jashar? And the sun stopped in the middle of the sky and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day.  There was no day like that before it or after it, when the Lord listened to the voice of a man; for the Lord fought for Israel.

Now there’s no reason the Scripture couldn’t have called on the earth to stand still if it was rotating.  But it doesn’t.  It tells the sun to stand still and the moon to stop – for a whole day!  This was never corrected.  No translation staying as close to the original language as it could has altered that interpretation. 

And Revelation 7:1 practically reiterates Enoch’s discourse on the four winds in chapter 76.  Revelation says it like this:

After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four winds of the earth,

And Enoch says it like this:

And at the ends of the earth I saw twelve portals open to all the quarters of the heaven from which the winds go out and blow over the earth.

The word translated “corners” in Revelation 7:1 is also translated “quarters” in Revelation 20:8.  In the Strong’s concordance they are interchangeable as corners or quarters. 

Maybe there’s more to Enoch and his revelations than the Church at large has allowed to come forth.

All this to say, Enoch was a refreshing book for me to read, full of wonder and revelation.  It presents images and explanations that make the Scripture come alive, and exposes stale or stagnant teachings that may need revisited, reevaluated, and possibly rethought. 

Monday, March 9, 2020

Isaiah: Part 2


ISAIAH, PROPHET OF SALVATION, PART 2

By Dr. Stephen Jones:  3-4-2020

Blog Post Date:  3-9-2020

Isaiah’s name is a shortened version of the Hebrew, Yesha yahu, “Yahweh Saves.” So his primary message was to tell Israel, as Paul put it, “all Israel will be saved” (Romans 11:26). Paul then quotes Isaiah 45:25 in support of this statement. Paul’s quotation was part of a longer passage in Isaiah 45:22-25,

22 Turn to Me and be saved, all the ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is no other. 23 I have sworn by Myself, the word has gone forth from My mouth in righteousness and will not turn back, that to Me every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance. 24 They will say of Me, “Only in the Lord are righteousness and strength.” Men will come to Him, and all who were angry at Him will be put to shame. 25 In the Lord all the offspring of Israel will be justified and will glory.

More than any other passage, this encapsulated Isaiah’s message and gave hope through the New Covenant vow of God Himself. Because of God’s “righteous,” He will keep His word. Because of God’s “strength,” He is able to keep His word in spite of all opposition. These two key concepts are the reason for the success of the New Covenant.

Most Christians today misunderstand the nature of the covenants. They are told that the Old Covenant is conditional and the New Covenant is unconditional. This is actually true, but it does not clarify the matter sufficiently. The Old Covenant is conditional upon man’s response and obedience; the New Covenant is unconditional in that it depends fully upon God’s will and ability to keep His oath.

The usual Christian concept of salvation today is essentially that it is based upon a conditional covenant—the Old Covenant. Why? Because the promises of God have no effect apart from man’s response. Since most men will not respond during their lifetime, it is assumed that death is the great deadline for salvation. Hence, only a tiny percentage of people can be saved through this Old Covenant method.

On the other hand, the New Covenant places the unconditional responsibility upon God Himself to save anyone and everyone. He did not merely vow to make it possible for us to fulfill our Old Covenant vows. No, God made a vow to save all mankind, and this vow is empowered by His strength and ability to fulfill it in righteousness. “Every knee will bow.” “Every tongue will swear allegiance.”

When? Obviously, for most people, this will occur at the Great White Throne judgment after they have been raised from the dead in the general resurrection. Hence, death is not a deadline for salvation; it is only a deadline to qualify as an overcomer who will be raised in the first resurrection and thereby receive “eternal life” (i.e., aionian life in the Millennial Age).

It is only because “God is able” that we may have confidence in the New Covenant, for it is based wholly on the sovereignty of God. In fact, using the principle of Equidistant Letter Spacing, if we begin with the first yod in Genesis 1:1, every 521st letter thereafter spells in Hebrew, Yeshua is able. Hence, God’s sovereignty, i.e., God’s ability to accomplish His will, is one of the earliest and most fundamental principles built into the Scriptures.

Whereas the ELS in Genesis sets forth Yeshua’s strength and ability in creation, the New Covenant oath in Isaiah 45 sets forth Yeshua’s strength and ability to save not only Israel but “all the ends of the earth.” In other words, in spite of all the sin, all the rebellion, and, yes, even in spite of all the divine judgments, God is still able to swear an oath that “every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance.”

In other words, He is able to save and restore all that He created in Genesis 1:1. The ELS of 521 that begins with the first yod in Genesis 1:1 also puts Yeshua-Jesus into the picture “in the beginning.” John 1:2 confirms this, telling us that Christ, the Logos, “was in the beginning with God.” This establishes Christ’s pre-existence.

The Significance of Isaiah’s Name
The prophet Isaiah was a type of Christ, even bearing His name and its Hebrew meaning. His book of prophecies shows forth Christ’s judgments upon Israel on account of its sin as well as Christ’s ability to restore the nation on account of the righteousness of God. The prophet was simply a spokesman, a mouthpiece through whom Christ spoke judgment and salvation.

It is obvious, then, that the judgment was temporary and corrective in nature. Judgment came upon them for violating their vow at Mount Horeb (Exodus 19:8), a vow which we call the Old Covenant. Being unable to fulfill their vow, they were judged. But God too made a vow, which we know as the New Covenant, first with Noah (Genesis 9:9, 12), later with Abraham (Genesis 12:2, 3), and still later with Moses (Deuteronomy 29:12-15) at the end of Israel’s wilderness journey, a covenant which Joshua (Yeshua) was commissioned to implement (Deuteronomy 31:23).

A spokesman is essentially an agent. So we may call Isaiah the agent of Christ. A good agent does not speak on his own initiative. He speaks only what he hears from another. We call it “inspiration,” and this is why we believe that all Scripture is inspired (2 Timothy 3:16). Just as Christ was His Father’s Agent, so also was Isaiah the agent of Christ. In fact, all who are inspired by the Holy Spirit are agents of Christ, commissioned as ambassadors of the Kingdom.

Isaiah’s salvation message was founded on the New Covenant, even though he was a prophet in a time when the Old Covenant dominated. But as we have seen, the New Covenant actually preceded the Old Covenant, being clearly set forth to both Noah and Abraham. Hence, as Paul tells us in Galatians 3:17, the New Covenant promises to Abraham could not be invalidated by the conditional covenant that came 430 years later in the time of Moses. No, the New Covenant has greater authority and the power to limit the jurisdiction of the Old Covenant.

Introduction to Isaiah’s First Message
Isaiah 1:1 begins,

1 The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz concerning Judah and Jerusalem, which he saw during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah.

The first thing we learn is that Isaiah was the son of Amoz, which means “strong.” We have already shown how the heart of Isaiah’s message was the New Covenant and how God is both righteous and strong. Hence, we see that Isaiah himself represents salvation, and his father is strong enough to save.

Secondly, Isaiah was from Judah, even as Yeshua-Jesus was from Judah. Was it possible that Isaiah was from Bethlehem as well? We are not told. Yet we know that he had a lengthy ministry that extended through four kings in Jerusalem, and tradition says that he was put into a log and sawn asunder in the reign of Hezekiah’s son, Manasseh.
Isaiah’s first “vision” begins in Isaiah 1:2,

2 “Listen, O heavens, and hear, O earth, for the Lord speaks, “Sons I have reared and brought up, but they have revolted against Me.”

Isaiah treats this as a statement in a court of law, calling both heaven and earth to witness what is being stated. God then speaks, referring back to Israel’s birth from Egypt, calling them “sons.” So also Hosea 11:1 says,

1 When Israel was a youth I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.

The same revelation was given to Moses in Exodus 4:22,

22 Then you will say to Pharaoh, “Thus says the Lord, ‘Israel is My son, My firstborn’.”

These were “sons” in that God was their heavenly Father. Their mother, of course, was Egypt, making them spiritual Ishmaelites, or donkeys (Genesis 16:12), which were in need of redemption to turn them legally into the sheep of His pasture (Exodus 13:12-14). The Passover lamb thus redeemed them and accomplished this legal maneuver, and this prophesied of things to come, when Jesus Christ, our Passover Lamb came to do so in a greater way.

The problem in Isaiah’s day was that those who were supposed to be “sons” of God were not acting like sons. They had reverted to the stiffnecked condition (a rebellious will) of spiritual donkeys. Jeremiah 2:24 complained of the same thing a century later.
The Apostle Paul later interprets such people as children of the flesh (Romans 9:7, 8; Galatians 4:29). In other words, their “sonship” position was based on fleshly genealogy and natural birth, rather than being begotten by the Spirit.

Such fleshly children, Paul says, are not inheritors of the Kingdom but must be “cast out” with their “mother,” the earthly Jerusalem (Galatians 4:25, 30).

Even so, because of the New Covenant, we know that God will turn the hearts of all men to Himself in the end, because “every knee will bow.” But before that happens, Hagar must be cast out in order to prove to all that no one can inherit the Kingdom by claiming to be a fleshly child of Abraham. They must renounce Hagar and claim Sarah as their spiritual mother. They must stop advocating for the earthly Jerusalem as the true mother of the Kingdom.

God will certainly save all Israel and all of creation. However, He will not do so until they repent, bow their knees to Jesus Christ, and profess their allegiance to Him. The New Covenant states that God is able to make this happen. He will not merely save everyone in their carnal state of rebellion. No, He will cause them to repent and to bow their knees, not out of compulsion, but by revealing Himself to them. Paul interprets Isaiah by paraphrasing him slightly in Philippians 2:11,

11 and that every tongue will confess [exomologeo] that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Their confession (exomologeo) is not extracted by force upon unwilling people. The word means “to acknowledge openly and joyfully, to profess that one will do something, promise, agree, engage.”

At the Great White Throne judgment, when all see Jesus for who He really is, when all finally know that He is Love personified, that His love compelled Him to swear an oath to turn every heart to Himself, then they will be awestruck at the salvation which they had previously ignored or rejected for lack of understanding or inspiration.

This is the only way in which their confession can be made "to the glory of God the Father."