Purpose

For Freedom From Delusion Commentaries and Series go to : https://commentariesandseries.blogspot.com/


To Be Notified of New Posts, Please Click the “Follower” Notification Located Below the Blog Archive



Friday, August 2, 2019

The Iniquity of Usury


THE INIQUITY OF USURY

8-2-2019

What do Hammurabi, Plato, Charlemagne, Dante and Queens Mary and Elizabeth have in common?  They all condemned, outlawed or regulated the charging of interest on loans.  In fact, until the early 1900s interest rates in the United States were kept at or near 10%.  And until 1979, loan laws provided some interest rate cap in every state.
Then everything changed.  Governments and banks put profits before people. And now the lending industry is spiraling out of control.

u·su·ry (yoo’zhe-ree)  n.pl. u·su·ries
·        The practice of lending money and charging the borrower interest, especially at an exorbitant or illegally high rate.
·        An excessive or illegally high rate of interest charged on borrowed money.
·        Archaic. Interest charged or paid on a loan.

Ezekiel 18:13 NET (a person) engages in usury and charges interest. Will he live? He will not! Because he has done all these abominable deeds he will certainly die. He will bear the responsibility for his own death.

Exodus 22:25 NET "If you lend money to any of my people who are needy among you, do not be like a moneylender to him; do not charge him interest.

Deuteronomy 23:20 states “You may lend with interest to a foreigner, but not to your fellow Israelite”.  I suppose the Rothschild inspired central banking system considers everyone a foreigner.  However, most likely they do not read the Biblical scriptures.

This Deuteronomy statement has justified the Jewish oppression of non-Jews. Even today, this kind of lawless behavior permeates the Israeli state in their treatment of Palestinians (and all others who are referred to as Goyim i.e. the people of nations).

Deuteronomy 23:19-20 NET (19) You must not charge interest on a loan to your fellow Israelite, whether on money, food, or anything else that has been loaned with interest. (20) You may lend with interest to a foreigner, but not to your fellow Israelite; if you keep this command the LORD your God will bless you in all you undertake in the land you are about to enter to possess.

From: Chapter 3 The Laws of Usury

“Foreigners” in this case refer to non-citizens of the Kingdom—the equivalent of unbelievers. Such people are those who live by a different set of moral laws established by someone other than Jesus Christ. If one was to give them an interest-free loan, they would have no twinge of conscience in loaning it to someone else at interest. A Kingdom citizen has no obligation to provide such a person with an interest-free loan. In such cases, charging interest is optional.

Biblical law makes a distinction between non-Israelites living in Israel and those living elsewhere. Any non-Israelite who came to live in Israel was to be treated by the same laws as all others, even as he was obligated to abide by the laws of the Kingdom. Lev. 25:35-37 makes this clear:

35 Now in case a countryman of yours becomes poor and his means with regard to you falter, then you are to sustain him, like a stranger or a sojourner, that he may live with you. 36 Do not take usurious interest from him, but revere your God, that your country-man may live with you. 37 You shall not give him your silver at interest, nor your food for gain.

In other words, if someone is in need, whether an Israelite or a foreigner, he was to be treated without oppression. Hence, Scripture makes it clear in so many places that the Israelites were not to oppress foreigners. This law is usually explained by the fact that the Israelites had been oppressed as foreigners in Egypt.

The Parable of the Ten Minas
Most Protestants and evangelicals had already cast aside the law of God and saw no harm in usury. In fact, many justified it by a unique interpretation of Jesus’ parable in Luke 19. In that parable, the “nobleman” went on a journey and left varying amounts of money in the care of his servants. When he returned, two of the wiser servants had increased the money by trade—that is, lawful business.

However, the third servant had a warped view of his master (who represented Jesus Himself). We read,

20 And another came, saying, “Master, behold your mina [a certain type of money], which I kept put away in a handkerchief; 21 for I was afraid of you, because you are an exacting man; you take up what you did not lay down, and reap what you did not sow.”

In other words, this foolish servant did not really know his master at all, and hence he was afraid to increase the “mina” by lawful trade. Further, he accused his master of being “an exacting man,” who was essentially a THIEF, reaping what he did not sow. So the master judged this servant by his own words:

22 He said to him, ‘By your own words I will judge you, you worthless slave. Did you know [perceive] that I am an exacting man, taking up what I did not lay down, and reaping what I did not sow? 23 Then why did you not put the money in the bank, and having come, I would have collected it with interest?”

In other words, Jesus said, if you really thought that I was an unscrupulous tyrant that reaped where others had sown, then why did you not just put the money in the bank in order to collect interest on the money? That way, I could have increased my wealth by robbery.

Interest on money was the equivalent of reaping where one has not sown.

This parable employs irony. One cannot take this as a command to charge interest on money. In fact, it teaches precisely the opposite. Only an unscrupulous businessman would engage in the practice of usury, because charging interest is theft. It is reaping where one has not sown. It is unlawful profiteering on other people’s labor.

Historical Bans on Usuary
800 A.D. Charlemagne outlaws interest throughout his empire.
11th century In England, the taking of any interest at all is punishable by taking the usurer’s land and chattels.

Medieval Canon Law Usury is punishable by ex-communication.

Medieval Roman Law Usurer’s are fined 4X the amount taken, while robbery is penalized at twice the amount taken.

1306-1321 Dante pens “The Inferno,” in which he places usurers at the lowest ledge in the seventh circle of hell – lower than murderers.

1553-1558 During the reign of Queen Mary, English Parliament again disallows the collection of interest.

In (Jacques) de Vitry’s (a French Cardinal of the early 1200s) world, the moneylender deserved to be defiled by demons, because he’d committed the sin of usury – charging interest on a loan. De Vitry didn’t care whether the rate was high or low, because the Church’s position was that extracting a single cent of interest was evil. The roots of this revulsion run deep, and across cultures. Vedic law in Ancient India condemned usury, and rulers routinely capped interest rates from Ancient Mesopotamia to Ancient Greece. In Politics, Aristotle described usury as ‘the birth of money from money’, and claimed it was unnatural because money was sterile and should not ‘breed’.

Judeo-Christian religions cemented the usury taboo. The Old Testament reads: ‘Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest,’ and the Book of Luke advises: ‘[L]ove ye your enemies: do good, and lend, hoping for nothing thereby.’ In the 4th century CE, Christian councils denounced the practice, and by 800, the emperor Charlemagne made the prohibition into law.

The returning Babylonian captives (Judah, Benjamin, and others) were familiar with the usurious practices of the Babylon Empire.  Nehemiah had to personally intervene with the usury systems instilled by some of the returning Jews.  It appears that a small group of Jews with wealth, had confiscated, by interest fees, many farms, lands, and houses.

Specifically, Nehemiah had to rid Judea of its usurious banking practice. Neh. 5:1-5 says,

1 Now there was a great outcry of the people and of their wives against their Jewish brothers. 2 For there were those who said, “We, our sons and our daughters, are many; therefore let us get grain that we may eat and live.” 3 And there were others who said, “We are mortgaging our fields, our vineyards, and our houses that we might get grain because of the famine.” 4 Also there were those who said, “We have borrowed money for the king’s tax on our fields and our vineyards. 5 And now our flesh is like the flesh of our brothers, our children like their children. Yet behold, we are forcing our sons and our daughters to be slaves, and some of our daughters are forced into bondage already, and we are helpless because our fields and vineyard belong to others.”

The Jews had learned to loan money at interest during their stay in Babylon, and even though they had gone out of Babylon, it was more difficult to get Babylon out of them. The practice of usury, then, is presented to us as the example of lawlessness that had to be corrected before Nehemiah could rebuild the wall in the next chapter.

In Nehemiah’s day, the people were being enslaved by interest-bearing loans, which was unlawful (Deut. 23:19). A famine had struck the land, and they were unable to repay their debts (Neh. 5:3).

This practice of usuary was practiced by various Jews throughout history.  The Jews in England established banking systems which led to the Rothschild’s dominant banking system within Europe.  This spawned the Federal Reserve system in the USA.  Reports claim the Federal Reserve was put in place in nefarious means.  After this action the Central Banking system was spread to all parts of the world.

Someone may ask, “What is the problem with the Federal Reserve and other Central Banks?”

Once upon a time the money supply was printed and issued by the Federal government.  It was based on gold and silver that was owned and stored by the Federal government.  No money of any kind could be issued unless there was the exact amount of gold and silver to back it up.

Along came the Rothschild banking affiliates and forced a central banking system upon President Woodrow Wilson at a time when the majority of Congress was on vacation.  Rather than a currency based on gold and silver, the new currency was based on nothing and is known as fiat money.  The money was usuriously loaned to the government with interest.  The IRS (internal revenue system) was set up to collect money from the wages of Americans to pay the interest (later came additional taxes to pay for certain government expenditures).  Of course the interest was never fully paid and the Fed continued printing more money and loaning it to the government which would never be paid back.  That is the reason for the huge national deficit. 

From the Federal Reserve web site:
It was created by the Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. The Federal Reserve was created on December 23, 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law.Nov 3, 2016.

The X-22 report, and several other sources, claim that Trump and the Patriots intent is to do away with the Federal Reserve.  This would allow the USA to print their own money which is in the Constitution.  It has been reported that many other countries are catching on to the truth and have similar plans.  Some claim that Russia has nationalized their once central bank which is under the Russian government’s control.

When gold became a commodity rather than money, President F Roosevelt, most likely an act of greed, issued an executive order claiming that personal ownership of gold was illegal and that it was to be returned to the government (at a low price point).

FDR's 1933 Gold Confiscation was a Bailout of the Federal Reserve Bank. 20,000 metric tons of gold were 'circulating naked' in 1933.” President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 1933 executive order outlawing the private ownership of gold in the United States was arguably unconstitutional.

The Bank of International Settlements loans money to many countries with interest and these countries are in as much debt as the USA.  This may be the One World plan to bankrupt the cultured civilized world to demand subservience to a so-called unified world government.

Because the Church discarded the law of God, many have come to sanctify theft in the name of Jesus. Because of this, we allowed the practice of usury in our modern banking system and thus, God put us into bondage to Mystery Babylon through the Federal Reserve Act, which put the entire nation and the Church itself into captivity.

And here we are in the midst of the magical money supply creation of Mystery, Babylon.

No comments:

Post a Comment