By
Ms. Smallback http://www.eternalissues.com/?cat=6
Date
of Blog Posting: 6-24-2019
(Ms. Smallback) My
working theory:
This
is merely my hypothesis, and I won’t be able to get it said in 2500 words, but
I’m going to try.
If
you’re older than thirty, you’d have to have been living under a rock to not
see the drastic changes in society and cultural norms for sexuality, marriage
and the family. They have changed dramatically here in America, and
relatively quickly.
To
be fair, I am not suggesting that the wide range of abnormalities (from
homosexuality to bestiality to pedophilia to transgender to anything-goes) is
unique to our time in history. I think such behaviors have been
throughout the history of man in varying degrees, however, I think the
abnormalities have been relatively concealed and not accepted socially as
normal on a wide-spread scale. Such perversions existed, but were socially
considered anomalies or freaks or mental disorders, etc. One who engaged
in such perversions had to find a culture that accepted them to be outwardly
accepted. (And I’m aware there are exceptions to this conclusion.)
For
the sake of brevity, I’m going to assume the average reader is aware of the
heightened perversions of sexuality in America and the judicial assault on
those who adhere to traditional and moral values. (As Dylan tweeted ) While the gay couple
who drove 120 miles past 67 secular-owned bakeries (including six bakeries
owned by Muslims) to get to the one bakery owned by a Christian to set up the
baker so they could accuse him of violating their beliefs while demanding the
Christian violate his own, this is barely scratching the surface for what the
past few years have brought us.
For
a moment, consider the mother
who is forcing her six year old son to undergo a gender transition against the
child and the father’s wishes, but with full legal support of the judicial
system. Recall
the various Hollywood “stars” who have adopted children and began transitioning
them to opposite gender. Look at legislation
being proposed to make gender assignment at birth illegal.
Transgenders in the open,
and in disguise…
If
you dare peek down the rabbit hole of transgender, you’ll find all sorts of
things that will shatter any concept you thought was normal before.
You’ll hear rumors that many women who are lauded in the entertainment and
social elite circles are actually men. [Lady Gaga, Shakira, Beyonce,
Megan Fox, Pink, Ciara, Sarah Jessica Parker, Sandra Bullock, Meghan Markle,
Taylor Swift, Jennifer Lawrence, Nicki Minaj, Madonna, Victoria Secret models,
etc.] I’m not saying they are or they aren’t; I am saying there is
disturbing evidence things are not what they seem. You have to look past
everything that hormonal altering drugs, surgery, make up, and training can
alter to actually see it. You’ll see the male Adonis belt (V-shaped
abdomen, narrow hips) on many renowned alleged female “stars”. You’ll see
the male long arms, the hips that are not wider than shoulders, broad shoulders,
etc. Also telling is the inability to produce children. How many of
these “stars” have adopted children…
There
are equally disturbing FTM (female to male) allegations of people like Prince
Harry and Tom Cruise. If you can see behind phalloplasty and testosterone
treatments, some tell-tales are a widow’s peak, a straight neck into a smaller
jawline, a s-curve in the back, and an overall smaller frame. If
testosterone treatments are later in life, (post pubescent), the tell-tales are
more obvious. When they’re done earlier, some otherwise natural feminine
traits get covered-up by the alterations testosterone does.
Yes,
the transgender bunny hole is disturbing when we consider that celebrities we
have applauded and admired for their beauty are con-artists, yet excellent
actors in every sense of the word. But this article is not about that,
and that topic is one every person will have to explore for him/herself.
I am not here to convince anyone of any particular person’s authentic gender; I
am merely explaining there is much to question.
(One
of) the problem(s) we get into when we even contemplate the veracity of such
claims, is the shock to our normalcy bias. Most of us reading this are
male or female, and identify ourselves with our biology, even if we have
preferences that cross the gender lines. In fact, there is still a
majority of the American population that is sexually normal and this type of
thinking is bizarre for us. So to think the actor or actress or musician
or famous person we’ve admired for all our lives is a liar and a fake of that
level of deception is, to put it mildly, shocking. Our minds will reject
such a possibility to restore our emotions to “normal”.
We
go in and out of our day with our normal gender habits, in our normal daily
living routine, and see people just like us day in and out, and we cannot
really comprehend that this is a reality in other places. And if it is a
reality, it’s an anomaly, we think, and we file it away in the abnormal
categories of things like drag queens and gay bars and other things we never
really go to or frequent or even really understand much of (in such a culture),
and mostly forget about it.
I’m
not here to convince anyone of these very real possibilities of which many or
most are actualities (though I don’t care enough to dissect and investigate
every famous person’s history). I’m just here to explain our society is
in an asexual revolution. If you leave the famous people who are actually
trannies out, you can still see in real life any number of average people
partaking of gender reassignments. Youtube
is replete with before and after pics and videos of people who began taking
hormones to begin the process of gender reassignment. You can see the lovely
young girl who after ten months of testosterone use has full facial hair and a
baritone or tenor voice.
There
is the wild conspiracy theory that the royal family is a family of trannies
(among other things). Prince Harry is rumored to be a FTM from birth, and
Meghan Markle was pre-selected for his tranny “wife”. [I know how
far-fetched this sounds to normal thinking. I’m going somewhere with this,
so hang with me. I haven’t made any decisions on what I believe about
this…yet. I’m just looking at theories.] While most of the tranny
female actresses and musicians adopt children, there are some that run the ruse
of pregnancy with a purchased baby bump.
This is the (conspiracy theory) explanation for the royalty births as
well.
And then there are the
androgynies
Now
to complicate matters even worse, the entertainment industry also promotes the
androgynous image. Ancient mythology tells us that Zeus created three
genders: male, female and androgynous. Ancient mythology
incidentally also formulates the tenets of belief for cults like Freemasonry,
Babylonian religions, Kabbalah, etc. Look at the ancient religions of
Egypt, Babylon, etc. and look at their images in their friezes, their statues,
their artwork. They are full of sexual scenarios, most of which are
perverse. They are also full of characters that are part human, part
beast. But back to androgyny…
Androgyny
is the concept that blends masculine and feminine qualities in the same
character. It’s asexual, if you will. If you will type “androgyny”
into a google search bar and hit “images”, you’ll get an excellent example of
what I’m talking about here. Sometimes to make the androgynous connection
more complicit, the name of the person is deliberately gender neutral.
(e.g. Taylor, Pat, etc.) An example may be “Rey”, from The Force
Awakens (Star Wars)…
Is
it male or female? Is it a he or she? Androgyny is a little of both
and a little of neither. It is asexual, and is aligned with millennia of
foreign gods, with a more elaborate explanation here. This really
is a current thing in pop culture, etc. Here’s an
example of the lauding of androgyny in modern day.
Why?
What’s the point?
What
I couldn’t figure out was, what’s the point? IF these theories are legit
and IF these allegations prove true, why would the people in elite status, go
to such an elaborate subterfuge? Why change gender identities in your
young with the designed purpose of presenting him/her as something they are
not? (Albeit they morph into their new identity and probably even believe
they are what they have become.) Wouldn’t it be easier to not go to such
lengths of deception? (both personally and outwardly)
As
I mulled this over, I heard the Spirit reference Malachi 2:15, He was “seeking
godly offspring.” To be specific, “a godly seed.” But
I’m going to circle back to this in a second. This is the understanding
we need, but first…
A
group of us are studying the Sermon on the Mount and we were on the section of
praying (Mt. 6:5-8). Even though the topic was prayer, when I read this
in Adam Clarke’s commentary, it helped me understand the current topic as well:
Prayer
is the language of dependence; he who prays not, is endeavouring to live
independently of God: his was the first curse, and continues to be the great
curse of mankind. In the beginning, Satan said, Eat this fruit; ye shall then
be as God; i.e. ye shall be independent: the man hearkened to his voice, sin
entered into the world, and notwithstanding the full manifestation of the
deception, the ruinous system is still pursued; man will, if possible, live
independently of God; hence, he either prays not at all, or uses the language
without the spirit of prayer.
When
you can relate the original sin as the desire to live independently of God, all
other sin makes sense. Now let’s go back to Malachi 2:15, but in greater
depth. From the New King James: But did He not make them [Adam
and Eve] one, having a remnant of the Spirit? And why one? He seeks
godly offspring.
From
the King James: And did not he make one? Yet had he the residue of the
spirit. And wherefore one? That he might seek a godly seed.
I’ve
pored over this passage in the various translations, taken it back to the
original Hebrew, and pored over various commentaries on it. Did God not
make them one? God made ONE man [Adam] and ONE woman [Eve], and made them
ONE flesh. The original Hebrew makes the translation into English a
little disjointed. Just to keep my breakdown honest so you understand my
explanation, here’s the original Hebrew:
Rwach
she’ar asah ‘echad lo’ = Spirit,
residue/remainder, to do or make, united, one, not
The
English sets prepositions and articles into the text to clarify, but I
understand it as a question that says with the residue of the Spirit at
Creation (by breathing into the man the spirit of God, making him a living soul),
God made one man and one woman to be one flesh.
Elohim
zera baqash echad mah le = supreme God
(plural), seed/posterity, to search out, united/one, why/what/how, for the
purpose of
What
is the purpose for one? Godly seed.
This
is so important but I don’t have space to go in depth on it. What you
have going on in Malachi is the Jews had been divorcing their Jewish wives to
intermarry foreign women, who of course introduce their foreign gods. God
was rebuking the Jewish men for this and ended with “I hate divorce”. In
his explanation of his reasons (through Malachi) God says this, Look, I made
one man and one woman to become one flesh. My purpose was to have godly
seed on the earth. Men and women who are made in MY image, that look and
act like ME. A creation that looks like its Creator.
How
does this connect with the transgender, homosexual and other sexual perversions
being promoted in our society? People who want to live independently of
God don’t want God’s design. In fact, people in rebellion to God want
anything BUT God’s design. They want a different system. They want
to be their own gods.
Three major resets on the
earth
We
have three distinct times there was a reset on humanity’s timeline: The
flood, the tower of Babel, and the Cross. The flood was the major reset
button as far as humanity living on the earth is concerned. All but eight
individuals were wiped out. The tower of Babel and the Cross reset the
circumstances on earth but didn’t reset the population. The flood and the
tower of Babel were roughly two hundred years apart, with the flood
first. They were roughly at the 2000 years into humanity’s
timeline. The Cross came 2000 years later. We are about another
2000 years after that.
[The
prophecies of Malachi were written about 400 years before Christ and that gap
is known as the 400 Years of Silence because no word of the Lord came forth
from Malachi until Christ.]
The
resets for humanity arrived because of significant alterations to the plan of
God. The flood came because humanity had rejected and rebelled to God’s
order. We find in Genesis 6:2 and 4 that fallen angels had intermarried
with the daughters of men creating a hybrid of people referred to as the
Nephilim. The Nephilim were the “mighty men … men of renown”. While
the people of earth praised and feared these people, they were a corrupt
people. Scripture tells us their wickedness was great and their thoughts
and imagination were continually evil. (Gen. 6:5) God regretted
making man on the earth and desired to destroy it but two things prevented Him:
First, He had already uttered a
decree (see Gen. 6:3). He said he would not always “strive with man, for
he is also flesh, and his days will be 120 years.” Contrary to popular
Christian false teaching, this does not mean the length of a man’s life was to
maximize at 120 years. It means flesh on the earth was relegated to 120
years. While the English is translated “years”, the Hebrew is shaneh,
which is a revolution of time. In Scripture a Jubilee is considered a
full cycle of time. Fifty years is a Jubilee, and 120 revolutions of time
would be six thousand years. God set the expiration date for humanity on
the earth, and it was not to expire until He decreed. By his own decree,
utter destruction at this juncture (the Nephilim and wickedness on earth in the
days of Noah) was not possible. (Because God does not lie and He keeps
His word.)
And
second, Noah found favor (grace is
the proper definition) with God. This is key because in Genesis 6:9 we
find that the generations of Noah were perfect AND Noah walked with God.
This literally means Noah’s generation or bloodline, was pure – without
Nephilim blood. Compare this to Abraham’s plea with the angelic
messengers sent to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. He pleaded that God would
surely not destroy a society if there were also righteous in it. God
agreed. Noah was righteous with no defilement of his bloodline by
intermarriage AND Noah walked with God.
These
two reasons are why God didn’t utterly destroy civilization in the Flood.
He preserved a remnant.
Godly Seed is the original
plan
In
Malachi, God’s last prophecies before Christ, we learn plainly that God desires
godly offspring, and the way to get that godly offspring is to keep the
original design for procreation: one man and one woman created in the
image of God.
If
I were the devil intent on leading humanity into independence from God, I’d
want to destroy the original design. In his book, Enoch goes into great
detail of the teachings of the fallen angels to the men on the earth, and how
they taught humanity to pollute their bloodline by all sorts of sexual
defilement, (including but not limited to sex with animals to produce other
creatures, and sex with fallen angels to produce demi-gods). This was the
social environment on the earth in the days of Noah.
The
Flood created a pretty clean slate, having destroyed the rest of the
living. However, just three generations from Noah the rebellion started
again. Noah’s son Ham had a son named Cush who had a son named
Nimrod. Nimrod means “rebellion”, according to Jewish authorities.
Scripture tells us Nimrod became a powerful tyrant (“mighty one”) and started
his own kingdom of city-states. The first was Babel (see Gen. 10:10).
According
to The New Complete Works of Josephus, published in 1999, Book 1, Chapter 4,
Paragraph 2-113 to Paragraph 3-117, page 56 to 57, we learn:
“Now
it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront (insult) and contempt of God.
He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength
of hand. He (Nimrod) persuaded them not to ascribe (attribute) it to God, as if
it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own
courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government
into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to
bring them into a constant dependence upon his power. He also said he would be
revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he
would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach and that he
would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers!”
“Now
the multitude were very ready to follow the determination of Nimrod, and to
esteem it a piece of cowardice (weakness) to submit to God; and they built a
tower, neither sparing any pains, nor being in any degree negligent about the
work: and, by reason of the multitude of hands employed in it, it grew very
high, sooner than anyone could expect; but the thickness of it was so great,
and it was so strongly built, that thereby its great height seemed, at first,
to be less than it really was. It was built of burned brick, cemented together
with mortar, made of bitumen (slime), that it might not be liable to admit
water. When God saw that they acted so madly, he did not resolve to destroy
them utterly, since they were not grown wiser by the destruction of the former
sinners; but he (God) caused a disturbance among them, by producing in them
diverse languages, and causing that, through the multitude of those languages,
they should not be able to understand one another.”
“The
place wherein they built the tower is now called Babylon, because of the
confusion of that language which they readily understood before; for the
Hebrews mean by the word Babel, Confusion”
So
already within two or three centuries of the flood we have a people group in
rebellion to God and God’s ways, and God reaches down and resets the current
society on earth by confusing their languages so they couldn’t carry out their
plans. The people dispersed and their plans were (temporarily)
abandoned.
We
further learn that the bloodlines of humanity are corrupted again through
Nephilim blood, after the Flood. We see later in Genesis, in Abraham’s
day, the ungodly seed have again begun populating the earth. You probably
haven’t been taught this in your western churches, but the Rephaim and its
tribes, are all Nephilim, aka “giants”. Their tribes are listed in
Scripture as Emim (the fearful ones), Rephaim (the dead ones), Anakim (the
long-necked ones), and Zamzummim (people whose speech sounds like buzzing).
No,
this corrupting of godly seed didn’t stop at the Flood. Is there some
reason to think it doesn’t exist today?
The
third reset came almost two millennia later with the prophesied arrival of the
Messiah. That reset offered humanity a way to walk with God in love and
obedience. Israel had failed to be the society that reflected
relationship with God. Society was corrupted. Christ came in with a
reset to reconnect humanity with their Creator. (I am really abbreviating
this.)
Remember
God’s words? He will not strive with man forever. His days are
numbered. Earth’s days are numbered. Flesh on earth is limited to
120 years. (or 120 jubilees which equals 6000 years)
Where
else have we learned this? Oh yes, Peter. Peter reminds us the
ancient earth was destroyed by water in the ancient past and the present earth
will be destroyed by fire. [See 2 Peter 3.] But notice the
interesting thing he takes pains to remind us of:
2
Peter 3:8-9 NASU
But
do not let this one [thing] escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one
day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. The Lord
is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward
you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.
Peter
just reminded the believers the earth was going to be destroyed again,
but next time by fire. Then he reminds them that they should not forget a
day is like a thousand years to God and a thousand years like a day.
The
ancient Hebrews knew the Lord created the earth as a template. They knew
the Creation was the model for humanity on earth itself. So each day of
Creation represented a thousand years of life on earth. Life on earth, as
the ancient Hebrews knew it, would wrap up at the end of the sixth day, or
after 6000 years. And Peter was reminding the believers of not only the
Lord’s return, but also the final destruction of the earth, and in those
reminders he interjected the reminder of the thousand years.
Christ
Himself said the coming of the Son of Man would be just like “the days of
Noah”. [Mt. 24:37]
If
I were the devil intent on leading humanity into independence from God, I’d
want to destroy the original design, but now I’d have to be even more
crafty. If I knew the surest way to destroy the God-purposed destiny for
man was to destroy man in the image of God, I’d set about destroying the tools
that replicated that design. I’d have to destroy procreation and replace
it with a perversion of it.
The
interference of demonic influence led the original man (Adam and Eve) away from
intimacy with God. Nothing has changed. This has been going on for
six millennia. But studying those who have gone before, we can learn some
of the techniques the devil uses to corrupt humanity. Remember that all
of humanity was corrupt in the days of Noah. They had intermarried with
fallen angels (demonic) blood. They were set on evil continually.
God reset with the Flood.
Nimrod
led the world back into that position when he founded Babylon and was building
the tower of Babel. Remember that Mystery Babylon of John’s Revelation is
the origin of the depravity of humanity on the earth in the revelation.
Nimrod’s agenda didn’t die; it just went underground.
The
angel in Revelation called Babylon “a dwelling place of demons and a prison
of every unclean spirit, and a prison of every unclean and hateful bird. For
all the nations have drunk of the wine of the passion of her immorality, and
the kings of the earth have committed acts of immorality with her, and the
merchants of the earth have become rich by the wealth of her sensuality.”
[Rev 18:2-3 NASU]
If
the kings of the earth have committed acts of immorality with this spirit of
rebellion, this spirit that rejects God’s sovereignty and rejects intimacy with
God, what quicker way could they do such than by rejecting God’s design for
“godly seed”. If they pervert the model for marriage, for family, and for
offspring, this is surely the quickest way to rebel to God’s leadership and
manufacture their own system. This system would be a mockery of
God’s. It would subvert the model for marriage and children.
But
because Christ reset humanity two thousand years prior, and there is a
righteous remnant that has not rejected the leadership and intimacy with God,
this would be a hard sell publicly. There are quite simply too many
people who want to walk with God, who embrace God’s plan. Sure, they
could carry out their plans in secret, and make a mockery of God’s plan in
secret – breeding corruption, evil and destruction. They could infiltrate
arenas with their perversion – but how would they manage to subvert God’s plan
mainstream?
If
I were the devil and if I could find a people group to assist me in this plan,
I could accelerate it and modify the human race out of the image of God and
into whatever my evil imagination could accomplish. I could get a certain
percentage of people to buy into this just by tempting them with personal
autonomy and affirming rebellion to God. It’s your body! It’s your
choice! You can do whatever you want with your body! This would
appeal to the immature, the selfish and the ignorant.
But
there’s a population that this won’t appeal to. So for that group I could
inject things into their environment that would cause gender confusion. I
could use the people in the independent group who demand their own rights over
their own bodies who abort their babies. Then I could take the aborted baby
parts and use them in all kinds of things like “artificial and natural
ingredients” in their food. (e.g. Senomyx which uses HEK-294 from
aborted baby cells) And I could use aborted baby tissue in things like
vaccines. If I used WI-38 (the cell lines from aborted females), then I
could confuse the male recipients by flooding their DNA with extra X
chromosomes.
I
could use the MRC-5 (aborted male cells) as well, so that a female would get
Y-chromosomes. It won’t be as effective for the females getting confused
because they’ll just have an extra Y chromosome. But it should be a lot
more effective for males confusing them with female genes, because they’ll be
flooded with two extra X-chromosomes! To ensure there’s a
consistent flooding of confusion, I’ll increase the vaccine schedule from the
five doses given in the 60s, and from the 24 doses given in the 80s, to the 72
doses they now get!
So
whatever portion of the people I couldn’t get by enticing them to rebel against
God, and whatever people I couldn’t get by tempting them with autonomy in their
sexual endeavors (through anything BUT the traditional model, the original plan
– e.g. LGBT, androgyny, etc.), I would have to malign their humanity in
subversive ways: GMO, DNA-modifications, chemtrails, AI, cloning,
transhumanism, etc.
Sexual
perversions prevail, and there’s an agenda to make them mainstream. Some
are joining in ignorantly, while others are in willful rebellion to God.
Altering the gender and sexual identity of humanity is to alter the work and
will of its Creator. It is to manufacture independent systems and to
replicate the corruption of the earth that led to the Flood. It is quite
plainly, the beginning of the end.
But
again, this is just a working theory….
No comments:
Post a Comment