Sionism VS Zionism

 SIONISM VS ZIONISM

By Dr. Stephen Jones

Blog Post Date:  6-7-2021

The Bible speaks of two cities that are laying claim to the Birthright. The Birthright is the right to give birth to the sons of God—those whom God has chosen to rule the earth. So these two cities are also pictured as women who each claim that their “son” is the inheritor of the throne.

Each of these two “women” has laid claim to a different “mountain” from which to rule the earth. Each mountain is its capital city, so to speak.

One of these “mountains” is Mount Zion in Jerusalem. This is the place where Zionists believe the Messiah will set up His kingdom to rule the earth. Jerusalem is the capital city of the Zionists.

The other “mountain” is Mount Sion, which is the new Jerusalem, a heavenly city. Rev. 21:2 and 3 says,

“And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, made ready as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is among men, and He will dwell among them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself will be among them.”

John saw the new Jerusalem pictured as “a bride.” This is the true bride of Christ who stands in contrast to the false bride. John calls the false bride “the great harlot” (Rev. 17:1), that is, the counterfeit bride.

The Apostle Paul’s View

In Galatians 4, the apostle Paul tells us that these two “women” were pictured in an earlier allegory. He tells us that Abraham had two wives, Hagar and Sarah, each of whom bore a son to Abraham. Hagar was a bondwoman, that is, a slave-bride; Sarah was a free woman.

In that story, the two women both believed that their son was the rightful heir of the Birthright. The dispute became so intense that God told Abraham to cast out Hagar and her son. Gal. 4:30 says,

“But what does the Scripture say? ‘Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be an heir with the son of the free woman’.”

Paul’s point was that there could be only one heir, and God had promised that this heir would come through Sarah, not through Hagar. The bondwoman, he said, represented the Old Covenant, which could not save anyone, nor could it save anyone from the bondage of sin. Old Covenant salvation was based on the promises of men to be obedient to God, but men have always failed to achieve salvation by the power of their own will.

Sarah represented the New Covenant, by which men are saved through the promise of God. God cannot fail to keep His word. His promises never fail. That is why our salvation comes only through the New Covenant.

Therefore, just as God told Abraham to cast out the bondwoman and her son, so also are we to reject the Old Covenant and its fleshly method of salvation by the will and works of men.

Paul says that Jerusalem represents the Old Covenant that is the foundation of Judaism, while the new Jerusalem represents the New Covenant which is the foundation of Christianity. Gal. 4:24, 25 says,

Now this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother.

Judaism and Christianity may have the same Father in heaven, but they have different mothers. Only those who are born from the free woman are heirs of the Kingdom. And yet, many Christians today think that the earthly Jerusalem is the mother of the church. If that were so, then the church itself must be cast out along with its mother.

This should serve as a warning to Christians as well as to Jews that Old Covenant faith is insufficient. We are not saved by the will of the flesh or by men’s promises to God, because John 1:13 says that we were “begotten not by bloodline, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.”

Those who have New Covenant faith are those who base their salvation on the promises of God, even as Abraham himself did. Rom. 4:20-22 says this about him,

Yet with respect to the promise of God, he did not waver in unbelief but grew strong in faith, giving glory to God, and being fully assured that what God had promised, He was able also to perform. Therefore, it was also credited to him as righteousness.

This was what the Apostle Paul taught the church.

Mount Zion and Mount Sion

Mount Zion was the seat of King David’s government after he conquered the city of Jerusalem. Jesus replaced it with Mount Sion, which is the seat of government under the New Covenant.

Many do not realize that these were not the same mount. Zion was in Jerusalem; Sion was Mount Hermon just north of the land of Israel. Deut. 4:47 and 48 says,

“They took possession of his land and the land of Og king of Bashan, the two kings of the Amorites who were across the Jordan to the east, from Aroer, which is on the edge of the valley of Arnon, even as far as Mount Sion (that is, Hermon).”

Mount Sion was outside the border of Israel. To get to Mount Sion (or Hermon) from Galilee, one had to go to the old city of Dan, which was later called Caesarea Philippi. This was situated at the base of Mount Hermon.

Jesus took His disciples to Caesarea Philippi before going to the top of Mount Hermon to be transfigured. Matt. 16:13 says,

“Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, He was asking His disciples, ‘Who do men say that the Son of Man is?’”

This was where Peter received the revelation that Jesus was the Son of God (Matt. 16:16). Apparently, Jesus spent six days at Caesarea Philippi, where He taught the Gospel of the Kingdom with His disciples. Then we read in Matt. 17:1 and 2,

“Six days later Jesus took with Him Peter and James and John his brother, and led them up on a high mountain by themselves. And He was transfigured before them; and His face shone like the sun, and His garments became as white as light.”

The Mount of Transfiguration was Mount Sion, that is, Mount Hermon. This is what made that mountain the capital of Christ’s Kingdom. That mountain was the mother of the sons of God who are the true inheritors of the Kingdom. So we read in Matt. 17:5,

“While he [Peter] was still speaking, a bright cloud overshadowed them, and behold, a voice out of the cloud said, ‘This is My beloved Son, with whom I am well-pleased; listen to Him!’”

Jesus’ heavenly Father declared Him to be “My beloved Son.” Those who follow Him to Mount Sion may also be declared to be the sons of God.

The Children of God

Those who go to Mount Zion in the earthly Jerusalem, those who consider Jerusalem to be their spiritual mother, are not the sons of God. They are instead the children of bondage, children of the flesh (Gal. 4:29). Paul tells us again in Rom. 9:6-8,

“For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but ‘through Isaac your descendants will be named.’ That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants.”

Just because some can claim physical descent from Abraham does not make them Abraham’s descendants. Abraham’s children are those who follow his example of New Covenant faith in the promises of God. Those who have faith in their own promise to God are still children of the flesh, because their promises are based on the will of man, not of God.

True faith believes God’s promise and does not have any confidence that man’s will brings about his salvation. Man’s will cannot initiate his salvation. Any promise that man makes to God must be seen as a response to God’s will. When God opens a man’s eyes to the truth of the gospel, he then responds by committing his life to Christ.

The Mother of the Sons of God is Mount Sion

The children of God are begotten on Mount Sion, not on Mount Zion. For this reason, Heb. 12:22, 23 says,

“But you have come to Mount Sion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to the myriads of angels, to the general assembly and church of the Firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the Judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, and to Jesus, the Mediator of a new covenant.”

In the verses preceding this statement, we are told that we were not called to Mount Sinai (as were the Israelites in the days of Moses). Instead, we have been called to Mount Sion. Mount Sinai is in Arabia, the inheritance that God gave to Ishmael, son of Hagar.

Paul tells us that “this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem” (Gal. 4:25). Mount Sinai was the place where the Old Covenant was given, and when the chief priests in Jerusalem rejected Jesus as the Mediator of a New Covenant, they put Jerusalem under the jurisdiction of Mount Sinai.

This is how Jerusalem came to correspond to Mount Sinai in Arabia. The physical locations were different, but legally speaking, they were equivalents. Anyone who considers Jerusalem or Mount Sinai to be their spiritual mother is not yet an heir. Heb. 12:12-14 tells us,

“Therefore, Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered outside the gate [of Jerusalem]. So let us go out to Him outside the camp, bearing his reproach. For here we do not have a lasting city, but we are seeking the city which is to come.”

To be an heir, one must follow the example of the Apostle Paul, who, in his early life, was a child of Jerusalem and a child of the flesh. As such, he persecuted the church. So we read in Gal. 4:28 and 29,

And you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise. But as at that time, he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now also.

Paul’s conversion on the Damascus road changed his status from a child of the flesh to a son of promise. This had nothing to do with his race or genealogy. It had everything to do with the quality of his faith.

Paul’s example shows us how to become children of God, heirs of the promise of God. When Paul’s spiritual mother was Jerusalem, he was a Zionist. When Paul claimed Mount Sion as his spiritual mother, he became a Sionist. Sionism looks to the place of Jesus’ transfiguration as the Son of God.

 

Zionism, Communism = Jewish Supremacy

ZIONISM & COMMUNISM HAVE SAME GOAL - JEWISH SUPREMACY

https://www.henrymakow.com/

May 4, 2019

(In this interview with Adam Green, Christopher Bjerknes explains that the real goal of Zionism is not a "homeland for the Jews" but a world empire ruled by Rothschilds and their fellow Jews. ) 

Historian Arnold J. Toynbee wrote, "There has... been the aim of converting the Gentile world to the worship of Yahweh under the aegis of a world-empire centred on Eretz Israel and ruled by 'the Lord's Anointed': a coming human king of Davidic lineage." (Reconsiderations, 1961, p. 486). 

This, folks, is the hidden agenda determining world history and the goal of BOTH Zionism and Communism. The "Left" (Communism, Demon-rats) and the "Right" (Zionism-Trump) are two sides of the same satanist Jewish coin.  Your mental if not physical enslavement is the goal of both. A genuinely nationalist conservative party will not be funded unless it swears fealty to Israel. Democracy consists of choosing which path we will take to Masonic Jewish world government. 

It Is NOT a Matter of "Zionism Versus Bolshevism". The Reality Is Zionism and Bolshevism Versus Us!

By Christopher Jon Bjerknes

(henrymakow.com) 

Winston Churchill famously published an article "Zionism Versus Bolshevism. A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.", Illustrated Sunday Herald, (8 February 1920), page 5; in which he posed the false dilemma of "Zionism versus Bolshevism" as if the world of Jewry consisted of good Zionist Jews in opposition to bad Bolshevik Jews. 

Churchill asked us to side with the supposedly good Zionist Jews so as to save ourselves from the bad Bolshevik Jews. This, as the allies were keeping the Bolsheviks in power in Russia and had just fought WW I to put them in power and seize Palestine from the Ottoman Empire.

Many have misunderstood Churchill and wrongly believe that he was an anti-Zionist. In fact, he wrote his article to scare the West into supporting Zionism with all its might and treasure. But neither Churchill nor Zionist Jews ever did any harm to the Bolsheviks. Instead, they gave them their full support.

The same Jewish bankers created both Zionism and Bolshevism as a means to fulfil Jewish messianic prophecy. The allies supported the Bolsheviks and the Zionists during and after both world wars.

Zionism sponsors the ingathering of the Jews. Bolshevism sponsors Jewish world government and the theft of all the private property of the Gentiles concomitant with enslavement and the dysgenic murder of the best Gentiles, leaving the Jews as a master race among imbeciles. Consider what this rabbi had to say:

The Jews see no contradiction between Zionism and Bolshevism. 2,500 years ago the Jews declared that they would destroy all Gentile governments and enslave all Gentiles, viz. Bolshevism. 2,500 years ago the Jews declared that they would genocide all the inhabitants of Palestine and steal their land and possessions viz. Zionism. As the Old Testament states:

Genesis 17:8:

"8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God."

According to the Jews, they had initially stolen the land of Palestine from the Canaanites and others through the process of deliberate and divinely commanded genocide and invasion, or, as the Old Testament puts it:

Deuteronomy 6:10-12:

"And it shall be, when the Lord thy God shall have brought thee into the land which he sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give thee great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, And houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not; when thou shalt have eaten and be full; Then beware lest thou forget the Lord, which brought thee forth out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage."

Deuteronomy 7:1-6:

"When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. 

For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth."

The march toward Jewish world government is a recurrent theme in the Old Testament, summarized in Psalms and Isaiah as:

Psalm 2:8-9:

"Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter's vessel."

Psalm 72:8-11:

"He shall have dominion also from sea to sea, and from the river unto the ends of the earth. They that dwell in the wilderness shall bow before him; and his enemies shall lick the dust. The kings of Tarshish and of the isles shall bring presents: the kings of Sheba and Seba shall offer gifts. Yea, all kings shall fall down before him: all nations shall serve him."

Isaiah 2:2-4:

"And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the Lord's house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more."

The enslavement of all non-Jews to Jews is stated in Zechariah 8:23::

"Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you."

Based upon this Old Testament passage, Jews believe they are each entitled to 2,800 Gentile slaves. The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbath, Folio 32b:

"Resh Lakish said: He who is observant of fringes will be privileged to be served by two thousand eight hundred slaves, for it is said, Thus saith the Lord of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold, out of all the languages of the nations, shall even take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you, etc."--I. Epstein, The Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Shabbath, folio 32b, Volume 7, The Soncino Press, London, (1938), p. 149.

To the Jew, there is no hypocrisy in being an international Bolshevik and a nationalist Zionist. It is simply Jewish privilege, as Albert Einstein the globalist Zionist stated,

"I am against nationalism but for the Jewish cause."--A. Einstein quoted in A. Fölsing, English translation by E. Osers, Albert Einstein, a Biography, Viking, New York, (1997), p. 429.

So it is not a matter of Zionism versus Bolshevism. Both serve the Jews to fulfil their messianic prophecies and to destroy us. Likewise, it is not a matter of Republicans versus Democrats, rather both the Democrats and Republicans are communist Zionists. The Democrats long siding with Lenin and Stalin and the Republicans having been subverted by the Trotskyite neo-Cons.

Both Hillary and Trump are in bed with the communist and Zionist Jews and both work against our best interests. We need a political party and candidates who represent us and serve our best interests.

EDITOR’S NOTE:  It may appear that I am running protection and vindication for President Trump.  However, many people do not understand that Trump is bringing down the deep state (i.e. Mystery Babylon) under the authority of God and many of Trump’s actions are misconstrued as sympathetic for the nation of Israel when in fact, he may be employing setups and fake narratives as traps.

Simply put, it is Us versus Them and to pretend otherwise is to serve their interests whichever side of the phony fence you land on.

Democrats, MSM, Russia, Zionism, & Immigration

DEMOCRATS, MSM, RUSSIA, ZIONISM, & IMMIGRATION

Considering the items and/or programs that Mr. Trump has currently enacted or intends to facilitate has led me to almost (not 100%, but almost) completely acknowledge that Mr. Trump has been chosen and placed as President of the USA by the hand of God i.e. he is anointed by God to change the course of American history for the eventual future placement of the Kingdom of God.  Not only for the USA, but for the entire world.  Other similar events are taking place in Europe and possibly elsewhere that I am not unquestionably aware of at the moment.

Mr. Trump is currently embroiled within a continual battle with the Democratic party, the Democratic congress, a few Republican congressional leaders, the mainstream media and press, Hollywood so-called celebrities, and a host of citizens generally referred to as left leaning, liberal, snowflakes, and possibly considered communists, socialists, Marxists, and several other names.

He has been branded and labeled with several possibly false accusations such as a misogamist (defines as hatred of marriage but has evolved to mean hatred of women), a racist, anti-semite, and others.  There are constant threats of impeachment for no rational reason other than alleged ties to Russia and/or Putin.   Some have even threatened impeachment due to his supposed and completely unproven mental health.

The so-called liberal Congress has been critical of Mr. Trump’s immigration executive order, but is immigration their actual concern or is it something else?  Perhaps their irrational hatred of Mr. Trump is due to their Zionist one-world government zeal.  Perhaps it is their fear of being disgraced or arrested for pedophilia.  In the case of John McCain it may be the fear of being confronted by their funding from the Rothschild family, the Saudi family, or for requesting campaign money from the Russians.

A majority of the Democrats, particularly congressional Democrats, refuse to acknowledge that Hillary Clinton lost the presidential race to Mr. Trump.  They have irrationally decided to blame the Russians as election hackers.  They consider any contact with a Russian to be the most despicable action a person can do.  They appear to be clamoring for positive respect among their peers but their words and actions may devolve into a political Democratic disaster.

The Russian Issue

The US Government under the Obama regime, began a crusade to topple several Arab governments in the Middle East.  These designated Arab countries were located around or near the state of Israel, and it has been alleged that Zionist Jewish influence in the USA is the persuasive power behind these invasions designed specifically for the convenience of the Israeli state.  These weakened countries, without a strong government, are more easily managed and directed and will eventually (or at least hopefully by the state of Israel) will be easier to conquer and eventually become a part of a future Greater Israel.

The Greater Israel dream is also supposedly responsible for the Ukraine coup, along with another NATO location in the near vicinity of Russia.  The Crimean section, who are mostly Russian, voted to secede from the Ukraine and become a part of Russia.  The Zionist members of Congress, the majority of the MSM echo parrots, along with a few other demented and irrational government people, accused Russian of invading Crimea and stockpiling military hardware across the border.  All of which were completely untrue and these lies are still being continually spoken today.

The Crimean issue, along with Russia’s presence in the Syrian conflict, as an ally of Assad, have engendered hatred by the groups listed in the above paragraph along with a host of sanctions imposed by the USG under Obama.  Recently, the failed Hillary Campaign has alleged the voting machines were hacked by the Russians under the orders of Putin.  Online research has revealed that American voting machines are not connected to the internet.  They can be reset or supposedly hacked but an individual has to be present with the machine to do so.  This idiotic accusation appears to be easily refuted but no one seems to be refuting and the hacking lie continues to spread.

Russia continues to be demonized by certain people, mostly Congressional members and MSM journalists.

There must be a profound reason the Russian lies, the Crimean lies, and the Syrian-Assad lies continue although the truth, which is retroactive to the lies, can be obtained.  Is Russia a roadblock to the USG/Israeli Zionist goal of a Greater Israel and a one-world government?  If so, what do John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Nancy Pelosi, and others expect to get as a reward?  Don’t they realize that Satan and his minions do not keep promises and bargains?

As mentioned above, Mr. Trump is anointed and appointed by God to begin tearing down the Mystery, Babylon system.  Russia, with their Orthodox Christian heritage, along with China with their newly enacted banking, finance, and monetary reforms are the modern “kings of the East” as spoken of in Revelation 16:12.  These eastern rulers, along with Mr. Trump, and soon coming European rulers will certainly prepare the way for the destruction of Mystery, Babylon and the commencement of the Kingdom of God.

The Zionist Issue

The majority (if not all) website authors and MSM journalists writing or speaking about the relationship of Trump and his supposed issues always appear to omit one major piece of information - which is:  The Zionist Jew and their minions.  The only exception I have found is: a few writers at the Veteran’s Today website.

All the major media is owned and operated by so-called Jews. The opinions, news items, and lies presented or avoided by the majority of MSM news channels are the ones important to the Zionist Jews in charge.  Anything disparaging their world view is not presented. 

Almost all pornography is owned, filmed, recorded, and financed by Jews.  It has been said the credits of a porn movie read like a Tel Aviv phone book.  LGBT, transgenderism, feminism, and black lives matter is financed and promoted by Zionist Jews specifically George Soros. 

The USA military is waging wars (aka the Arab Spring, Libya, Syria, a desire to attack Iran, and a desire to start WWIII with Russia).  These wars appear to be for the growth of greater Israel – they have certainly not attacked the USA.  Various Jewish billionaires fund most Democrats and some notable Republicans (McCain, Graham, Ryan, possibly others).  Therefore, it is my opinion, from several years of studying scripture and certain publications, that Zionist Jews and their Zionist American puppets, desire to destroy America and reduce it to a third world country with Russia as the next target.

The ultimate goal of the Zionist Jews is a one-world government with Israel as the seat of government with a reduced earthly population of low IQ, mixed, brown-skinned people for menial slave labor.

The Immigration Issue

The immigration problem is an issue that doesn’t appear to have a good solution.  A Christian should believe that God created all people of all races, but did He intend for everyone to live together in one country as one big happy family?  Some will say the answer is “yes” (i.e. “love your neighbor as yourself”) but why were the races and ethnic groups relatively separated throughout most of the course of history?  Genesis relates that God separated the people by assigning different languages at the tower of Babel and the groups went their separate ways.

Religious persecution initially brought white Europeans to America who upset the lifestyles of the American Indians.  Slave traders brought Africans to America as cheap labor, who, for a time, upset the white lifestyles.  The Arab Spring and other unnecessary Mideast wars supposedly started the wave of Islamic/Arab immigrants to Europe and the USA.  The Islamic shooting sprees that have occurred in the USA, France, and Germany have been blamed on the CIA or the Israelis as false flag events.  Some countries like Merkel’s Germany first welcomed immigrants with open arms.  Liberal Americans, who know a few Hispanics or Arabs think immigration is a great idea, others not so much.  Most Hollywood celebrities are hyper-pro-immigration as long as they are only in their neighborhoods as housekeepers and grounds workers.

Some Islamic/Arab and Hispanic immigrants actually arrive to work and be a part of the culture.  Others come to receive a government handout, while they commit rape, pillage, murder, and other crimes.  Some people have suggested that government entitlements (welfare, food stamps, etc.) should be completely shut off, but that is a dangerous monster with a head difficult to cut off.  A blockage to Hispanic money earned in the USA being sent back to Mexico would stop the entrance of many immigrants who do not desire to become inclusive American citizens.