IS
ABORTION A "JEWISH THING"?
May 19, 2019
Unexpectedly, the final battle of the
NWO may come down to abortion or the sacredness of human life.
Several
States and many people are beginning to understand that abortion is murder i.e.
infant sacrifice. Alabama understands
that the Federal Law overrides their State law to ban abortion. They are hoping it will reach the Supreme
Court and perhaps override the infamous Roe vs Wade decision.
Lawmakers Vote to Effectively Ban
Abortion in Alabama
Missouri Senate passes bill to ban
abortions at 8 weeks
The Louisiana legislature is halfway
toward passing a law — like the ones enacted in Mississippi
and Georgia
— that will ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, about six weeks
into a pregnancy and before many women know they're pregnant.
Alyssa Milano calls for sex strike,
ignites social media
Several conservatives agreed with her
maintaining that unmarried women should not be participating in sexual activity
at all, with anyone. This would
definitely solve the abortion issue.
The NWO ultimately is about the destruction of
Christianity by Cabalist Judaism.
Most Jews don't know this. Cabalist Judaism is not a religion but a satanic
cult in which the "Jewish people" are God.
In practice, the satanist Jewish leadership (the
Rothschilds) supplant God and redefine morality by turning it on
its head. Their vehicles are Organized Jewry and Freemasonry
(liberalism, communism, socialism, zionism and feminism.)
Jews are at
the forefront of the pro-death forces because they don't believe human
life is sacred. How could they if the Talmud regards non-Jews as cattle? How
else could they justify their treatment of Palestinians? They were also at the forefront of
"sexual liberation" and pornography resulting in so many unwanted
pregnancies. There were 880,000
abortions in the US in 2017; 40 million worldwide. 93% of Jews
support abortion.
Below a Jewish writer expresses her alarm that
Christian’s values may be foisted on Jews, rather than the other way
around.
Karen who sent this article: "This Jewish
woman (quoting rabbis) says abortion is a cherished Jewish value! "More to the point, the new law refers to
an embryo or fetus as the unborn child. That language reflects a distinctly
Christian view of when life starts." Well, she says it all: distinguishing
Christians from Jews. Basically, this is the TALMUD verses the BIBLE!!!
"This (Christian) view infringes on my
religion freedom as a Jew." she says. This article is a must read to
see what the Jews believe!!!"
Opinion of a Jewish Writer
by Debra Nussbaum Cohen
(henrymakow.com)
The evangelical crusade making its way from Alabama
to the Supreme Court will force American Jews to submit to their distinctly
Christian anti-abortion dogma
When Alabama's governor this week signed into law
the United States' most restrictive ban on abortion, making it illegal in
nearly all circumstances, it set up a challenge to the U.S. Supreme Court's
1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which made abortion up to 24 weeks a Constitutional
right.
It also presented a threat to my religious freedom
as a Jew.
The Alabama law permits termination of a
pregnancy only when it poses a "serious" health risk to
the life of the mother, has a "lethal anomaly" or is ectopic. The
last two conditions don't even refer to viable pregnancies.
No exceptions to the abortion ban in cases of rape
or incest were included in the new law, which would charge a doctor who
performs an abortion with a felony and the possibility of up to 99 years in
prison.
More to the point, the new law refers to an embryo
or fetus as "the unborn child." That language reflects a
distinctly Christian view of when life starts.
Governor Kay Ivey made no secret of that when she
said that the new law is "a powerful testament to Alabamians' deeply held belief that
every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift from God."
Alabama State Representative Rich Wingo, a
Republican and architect of the new law, told The New York Times, "Our
position is just simply that an unborn child is a person." Alabama Senator Clyde
Chambliss, who shepherded the bill through the chamber, declared: "I
believe that if we terminate the life of an unborn child, we are putting
ourselves in God's place."
That view, like those embedded in new
"heartbeat laws" in Georgia and several other states, reflects the
institutionalization of Christian hegemony in America. They infringe on my
religious freedom as a Jew.
The very first words of the
U.S. Constitution's First Amendment are: "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof." The U.S. Supreme Court in 1947 unanimously ruled in Everson v.
Board of Education that the Establishment Clause forbids practices that "aid one religion" or "prefer one religion over
another," and also those that "aid all religions."
In other words, the government is not permitted to
pass laws favoring one religion over another, or over no religion.
Anti-abortion activists march with placards and
chant in front of the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. January 22, 2015AFP
This is key, because according to classical Jewish
text and most rabbinic interpreters, a developing embryo or fetus is not
"an unborn child" or "person," but has the legal status of
an appendage of the pregnant woman. It is part of her body, not a separate
person, until the moment that a majority of a viable baby capable of
independent life has been born.
Contemporary rabbis hold, of course, a range
of views. Politically and religiously conservative Orthodox rabbis say that
abortion is permitted only when pregnancy poses a threat to the mother's life.
Rabbi David Novak heads the Jewish
Pro-Life Foundation, which in its video calls embryos and fetuses
"Jewish children" and states that "life begins at
conception," though it does not offer an explanation for its use of this
language. The "position of the tradition is that abortion is prohibited
unless the fetus is a threat to the life of the mother, which is extremely,
extremely rare these days with prenatal care," Novak told me. "The
only basis of dispute is how widely or narrowly does one interpret a threat to
the mother's life."
Others have a more nuanced perspective
of Judaism's position. "Abortion is neither murder nor
manslaughter," but "in a moral category that is completely different
than the way the Catholic Church and some evangelicals view" it, says
Rabbi Jack Moline, president of the Interfaith Alliance.
The Jewish Conservative movement's Rabbinical
Assembly on Wednesday night agreed, expressing its "emphatic"
opposition to the Alabama decision: "Jewish tradition cherishes the
sanctity of life, including the potential of life which a pregnant woman
carries within her, but does not believe that personhood and human rights begin
with conception, but rather with birth,
as indicated by Exodus 21:22-23.
Pro-choice supporters protest the Alabama state
Senate vote on the strictest anti-abortion bill in the United States. Montgomery,
Alabama, U.S. May 14, 2019\
Denying a woman and her family full access to
the complete spectrum of reproductive healthcare, including contraception,
abortion-inducing devices, and abortions, among others, on religious grounds,
deprives women of their Constitutional right to religious freedom."
The Supreme Court's decision in Roe was based not
on a determination of when life begins but rather on a woman's right to
privacy and autonomy through the first trimester. That
jives with Judaism's classical understanding of when life begins. The first 40
days, or close to 6 weeks, are a period in which the Talmud says pregnancy is
"like water."
The Mishna states that even a woman who is nine months pregnant may be executed if that is the
punishment meted out to her for committing a crime. Her execution may not be
delayed to spare the pregnancy unless she has already begun to give birth since
the fetus is not a person.
Debating when life begins is an unwinnable fight.
Each person's view depends on their religious and political positions.
Instead, the legal battle over the new laws like
Alabama's can be based on the Constitutional right to the free exercise of
religion. Can government privilege one religion's view of when life begins over
another's?
As a Jewish woman and mother of daughters, I know
this fight is of vital importance to every woman who discovers she is pregnant
and does not want to be. But it is also of fundamental importance to the civil
rights and religious freedom of every American Jew.
Just as no law can obligate us to share the
religious beliefs of evangelical Christians, neither should a law demand that
we share their view of when life begins.
PRO-LIFE BLOGGER/ADVOCATE RECIEVING DEATH AND
RAPE THREATS AGAINST HIS FAMILY
Matt Walsh, author of The Unholy Trinity, and a staunch pro-life advocate, describes his position on abortion in the following way "As I have explained many times, I am opposed to abortion in all cases, at all stages, for any reason, no matter the circumstances or manner of the child's conception. My reason, as I've extensively outlined, is that unborn people are people. All people, in my view, have inherent human rights. The right to life is first and foremost and can only be forfeited if a person becomes an active threat to another person, or commits a particularly heinous and violent crime. Since there can be no such thing as a punitive abortion or abortion in self-defense, all abortion is evil because all abortion kills innocent and defenseless people. That's my case, and the case of every staunch pro-lifer."
In a piece Walsh wrote over at The Daily Wire, he explains how he gets hate mail all the time for his conservative opinions, but the "graphically violent messages," he has been receiving of late, are extremely chilling, from liberals unable to discuss or debate, but instead, as seen in his May 16 post shown in the screen shot above, resort to threats of violence, rape and even death, not just against him for his opinions, but against his wife and small children.
