THE LOGOS, PART 2
By
Dr. Stephen Jones: Aug 23, 2019
Blog
Post Date: 9-9-2019
John 1:1 tells us,
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.
The
Word is logos, a Greek word that had long been used in a philosophical
context, but which John adopted to describe the Hebrew concept of davar.
The Greek concept separated logos from matter, because their idea was that
spirit (and logos) was good but matter was evil. They said also that spirit was
uncreated, having no beginning, whereas matter was created by a lesser god
called the demiurge. By the first century, this demiurge had become known as an
evil god.
The
Greek view said that the fall of man occurred when spirit and matter came
together, and that the solution was to separate them. The Hebrew view said that
a good God created matter and breathed His Spirit into it and that the result
was “very good” (Genesis 1:31).
When
a Greek or Gnostic began reading John’s gospel, he would have been interested
in the Logos, and he would have agreed that the Logos was God. By the time he
got to verse 3, he would have begun to see that John was teaching something
different, something new to him, because John claimed that this Logos—and not
the demiurge—was the Creator.
This
meant that matter was created by a good God by the orderly and reasonable
principle of the Logos. By the time he reached verse 14, where he read, “and
the Word became flesh and dwelt among us,” he would have realized that this
book was heretical and radically different from Greek culture and religion.
Logos
as Divine Order and Reason
The
word of God is intelligible and reasonable, because God is both intelligent and
reasonable. He may be an “unknown God,” but He is not unknowable. We may never
know Him completely, but the word of God was given to us for the purpose of
revealing who God is, not by human reasoning of the soul but by the revelation
of the Holy Spirit indwelling the human spirit. So we read in 1 John 5:20,
20 And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us
understanding, in order that we might know Him who is true, and we are
in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal
life.
The
Greeks sought human wisdom; the Jews looked for signs; we seek the word, which
is spiritual revelation. Most people
seek truth through the soul, because they cannot distinguish between soul and
spirit. Therefore, what they perceive as
being spiritual is actually soulish. The
soul has tremendous power in itself, simply because it is God-created, and some
men, through discipline, are able to harness its powers in seemingly
supernatural ways. But in the end, it is not the spirit, and therefore it falls
short of the glory of God.
Paul
speaks of “the logos of the cross” in 1 Corinthians 1:18, contrasting it with soulish
reasoning. The logos of the cross contains a higher logic that the
unenlightened soul cannot comprehend until it submits to the teaching of one’s
spirit, which knows all things. Examples include Moses’ instruction to cast a
tree into the bitter waters of Marah to make the waters sweet (Exodus 15:25), and Elisha’s instruction to cast a
tree branch into the Jordan River to recover the axe head that had been lost (2 Kings 6:6). Such instructions were nonsense to
the soulish mind, but these were very logical to the spiritual mind, which
understood that the tree, by the principle of identification, was the cross of
Christ, which transforms the bitter heart and recovers the people of the iron kingdom
to the Kingdom of God.
Such
is the logical word of the cross. It is not unknowable, but one must find the
truth through the inner spiritual man that discerns all things (1 Corinthians 2:15). Logos is speech using words
that are orderly, logical, and sensible.
Logos
is with God and is God
A
Greek reader would have found John’s statement to be quite odd, for how could
the Logos be both God and with God? There are many different views about
this, each according to one’s view of the relationship between the Creator God
and Jesus Christ. Those who do not believe that Christ pre-existed and
participated in the creation of the world will say that the logos was simply
the spoken word of the Creator. To such, the word of God was not a Him
but an it.
The
Greek language has masculine and feminine nouns, and in this case logos
was masculine. Hence, they dispute with translators such as the NASB, which
render John 1:2, 3,
2 He
[the Logos] was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into
being by [dia, “through”] Him [the Logos], and
apart from Him [the Logos] nothing came into being that has come into
being.
They
insist that it should be rendered:
2 It was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into
being through it, and apart from it nothing came into being that has come into
being.
Unfortunately,
in John’s day the Greek language was written without upper and lower case
letters, so the letters themselves give us no clue how to understand the logos.
One’s
prior viewpoint determines whether we should personify the Logos as “Him” or
limit the logos as a simple word (“it”) that was spoken by the Creator.
I,
of course, see the Logos as a blend of both. I see a pre-existent Christ
declaring “Amen” to the word of the Father. Because Christ is the perfect Image
of God, and because He is always “the faithful and true Witness, the
beginning of the creation of God” (Revelation 3:14), the Logos is both with the
Creator and is the Creator. In other words, the Father is the Logos, but so is
the Son, for Hebrews 1:1, 2 says,
1 God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many
portions and in many ways; 2 in these last days has spoken to us in
His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the
world.
To
speak is to use reasonable words (logos). Those words from the Father
created the world, but these were repeated as a double witness by “His Son…
through whom also He made the world.” The Son, then, was pre-existent, and
one cannot separate the Son from the creative process. Furthermore, the fact
that God now speaks “in His Son” shows that “to us” the Son is the Logos
personified.
Whatever
God speaks must immediately come into being, because God is not a liar. If God
affirms by His logos that something exists, when, in fact, it does not exist,
then it is compelled to come into existence, simply because God’s word is
truth. This is the foundation of the law of imputation, where God calls into
being that which does not exist. That is spiritual logic, based upon truthful
premises:
God
is sovereign.
God
spoke.
Christ
bore witness.
Therefore:
it is.
The
only One not “made” by the double witness was Christ Himself, for He was taken
out of the bosom of the Father and was thus “the only begotten God” (John 1:18). The divine Double Witness had to be
begotten first in order to provide a double witness for the creation as a
whole.
The
Logos is Alive
4 In Him [the Logos] was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 The
light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
Whether
we believe in the Logos or the logos, we must affirm that the Logos was and is
alive. If it were a dead word, it would
have been powerless to create anything meaningful. We today are so used to dead
words that we have difficulty comprehending a living, creative word. We have
lived in the darkness for too long. Our eyes are used to the darkness, and
light tends to blind us. We have difficulty comprehending light. We squint and
cannot focus our eyes, and so truth appears as a strange and incomprehensible
thing.
The
Jewish view that a man like Moses was the embodiment of the living word, a man
who was so full of the word that he would be the very image of God, was not far
from the truth. They even believed that the Messiah would be like Moses in this
way—and perhaps even greater, if some might conceive of Moses as being
imperfect without disrespecting him. Their problem was that even as their
forefathers had often wanted to stone Moses, so also did they actually stone
Jesus on the cross.
Such
was the usual manner of judgment, even meted out upon those being crucified.
The people passing by on the road were expected to throw stones, trying to hit
the face of the convicted criminal. For this reason, Isaiah 52:14 KJV says, “His visage was so
marred more than any man.” When His light shined in the darkness, the
darkness could not comprehend it.
The
living word in John 1:4 is merely an
introduction to the rest of John’s gospel, where Christ is presented to us as
the Source of life. In John 4:10 Jesus told the
Samaritan woman at the well that He was the source of “living water” and that
if she would drink this water, it would make her “a well of water springing
up to eternal life” (John 4:14). Such is the
quality of life. Life begets life. She too could become a source of life for
others. This was a revelation that an angel gave to Hagar at the well that she
named Beer-lahai-roi (Genesis 16:14). It means “the well of living
after seeing (God).” To “see” is to drink of the living water.
In John 5:25 Jesus said that those who hear the
voice of the Son of God—i.e., those who hear the logos/word—will live. The
creative, living word of the Father, spoken through the Son, causes men to
live.
In John 6:48 Jesus said, “I am the bread of life.”
In verse 51 He says, “I am the living bread that came down out of heaven.”
Anyone who eats of this living bread will receive immortal life in the same
manner that drinking His water will impart immortal life. To drink is to see;
to eat is to hear the voice/word of the Son of God.
Either
way, John presents us with Christ’s teachings which show that He is the Logos,
the source of (immortal) life. John’s introduction is a mere statement, which,
if taken alone, can be disputed by theologians with differing opinions. But
when we see how the truth unfolds throughout the rest of John’s gospel, the
meaning becomes clear. The pre-existent Logos was alive, became flesh, and was
seen in the Person of Jesus. Those who eat and drink from Him, those who see
and hear the Father’s words through the Son’s voice, are given immortal life as
well.
No comments:
Post a Comment