Purpose

For Freedom From Delusion Commentaries and Series go to : https://commentariesandseries.blogspot.com/


To Be Notified of New Posts, Please Click the “Follower” Notification Located Below the Blog Archive



Showing posts with label usury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label usury. Show all posts

Friday, August 2, 2019

The Iniquity of Usury


THE INIQUITY OF USURY

8-2-2019

What do Hammurabi, Plato, Charlemagne, Dante and Queens Mary and Elizabeth have in common?  They all condemned, outlawed or regulated the charging of interest on loans.  In fact, until the early 1900s interest rates in the United States were kept at or near 10%.  And until 1979, loan laws provided some interest rate cap in every state.
Then everything changed.  Governments and banks put profits before people. And now the lending industry is spiraling out of control.

u·su·ry (yoo’zhe-ree)  n.pl. u·su·ries
·        The practice of lending money and charging the borrower interest, especially at an exorbitant or illegally high rate.
·        An excessive or illegally high rate of interest charged on borrowed money.
·        Archaic. Interest charged or paid on a loan.

Ezekiel 18:13 NET (a person) engages in usury and charges interest. Will he live? He will not! Because he has done all these abominable deeds he will certainly die. He will bear the responsibility for his own death.

Exodus 22:25 NET "If you lend money to any of my people who are needy among you, do not be like a moneylender to him; do not charge him interest.

Deuteronomy 23:20 states “You may lend with interest to a foreigner, but not to your fellow Israelite”.  I suppose the Rothschild inspired central banking system considers everyone a foreigner.  However, most likely they do not read the Biblical scriptures.

This Deuteronomy statement has justified the Jewish oppression of non-Jews. Even today, this kind of lawless behavior permeates the Israeli state in their treatment of Palestinians (and all others who are referred to as Goyim i.e. the people of nations).

Deuteronomy 23:19-20 NET (19) You must not charge interest on a loan to your fellow Israelite, whether on money, food, or anything else that has been loaned with interest. (20) You may lend with interest to a foreigner, but not to your fellow Israelite; if you keep this command the LORD your God will bless you in all you undertake in the land you are about to enter to possess.

From: Chapter 3 The Laws of Usury

“Foreigners” in this case refer to non-citizens of the Kingdom—the equivalent of unbelievers. Such people are those who live by a different set of moral laws established by someone other than Jesus Christ. If one was to give them an interest-free loan, they would have no twinge of conscience in loaning it to someone else at interest. A Kingdom citizen has no obligation to provide such a person with an interest-free loan. In such cases, charging interest is optional.

Biblical law makes a distinction between non-Israelites living in Israel and those living elsewhere. Any non-Israelite who came to live in Israel was to be treated by the same laws as all others, even as he was obligated to abide by the laws of the Kingdom. Lev. 25:35-37 makes this clear:

35 Now in case a countryman of yours becomes poor and his means with regard to you falter, then you are to sustain him, like a stranger or a sojourner, that he may live with you. 36 Do not take usurious interest from him, but revere your God, that your country-man may live with you. 37 You shall not give him your silver at interest, nor your food for gain.

In other words, if someone is in need, whether an Israelite or a foreigner, he was to be treated without oppression. Hence, Scripture makes it clear in so many places that the Israelites were not to oppress foreigners. This law is usually explained by the fact that the Israelites had been oppressed as foreigners in Egypt.

The Parable of the Ten Minas
Most Protestants and evangelicals had already cast aside the law of God and saw no harm in usury. In fact, many justified it by a unique interpretation of Jesus’ parable in Luke 19. In that parable, the “nobleman” went on a journey and left varying amounts of money in the care of his servants. When he returned, two of the wiser servants had increased the money by trade—that is, lawful business.

However, the third servant had a warped view of his master (who represented Jesus Himself). We read,

20 And another came, saying, “Master, behold your mina [a certain type of money], which I kept put away in a handkerchief; 21 for I was afraid of you, because you are an exacting man; you take up what you did not lay down, and reap what you did not sow.”

In other words, this foolish servant did not really know his master at all, and hence he was afraid to increase the “mina” by lawful trade. Further, he accused his master of being “an exacting man,” who was essentially a THIEF, reaping what he did not sow. So the master judged this servant by his own words:

22 He said to him, ‘By your own words I will judge you, you worthless slave. Did you know [perceive] that I am an exacting man, taking up what I did not lay down, and reaping what I did not sow? 23 Then why did you not put the money in the bank, and having come, I would have collected it with interest?”

In other words, Jesus said, if you really thought that I was an unscrupulous tyrant that reaped where others had sown, then why did you not just put the money in the bank in order to collect interest on the money? That way, I could have increased my wealth by robbery.

Interest on money was the equivalent of reaping where one has not sown.

This parable employs irony. One cannot take this as a command to charge interest on money. In fact, it teaches precisely the opposite. Only an unscrupulous businessman would engage in the practice of usury, because charging interest is theft. It is reaping where one has not sown. It is unlawful profiteering on other people’s labor.

Historical Bans on Usuary
800 A.D. Charlemagne outlaws interest throughout his empire.
11th century In England, the taking of any interest at all is punishable by taking the usurer’s land and chattels.

Medieval Canon Law Usury is punishable by ex-communication.

Medieval Roman Law Usurer’s are fined 4X the amount taken, while robbery is penalized at twice the amount taken.

1306-1321 Dante pens “The Inferno,” in which he places usurers at the lowest ledge in the seventh circle of hell – lower than murderers.

1553-1558 During the reign of Queen Mary, English Parliament again disallows the collection of interest.

In (Jacques) de Vitry’s (a French Cardinal of the early 1200s) world, the moneylender deserved to be defiled by demons, because he’d committed the sin of usury – charging interest on a loan. De Vitry didn’t care whether the rate was high or low, because the Church’s position was that extracting a single cent of interest was evil. The roots of this revulsion run deep, and across cultures. Vedic law in Ancient India condemned usury, and rulers routinely capped interest rates from Ancient Mesopotamia to Ancient Greece. In Politics, Aristotle described usury as ‘the birth of money from money’, and claimed it was unnatural because money was sterile and should not ‘breed’.

Judeo-Christian religions cemented the usury taboo. The Old Testament reads: ‘Do not charge a fellow Israelite interest,’ and the Book of Luke advises: ‘[L]ove ye your enemies: do good, and lend, hoping for nothing thereby.’ In the 4th century CE, Christian councils denounced the practice, and by 800, the emperor Charlemagne made the prohibition into law.

The returning Babylonian captives (Judah, Benjamin, and others) were familiar with the usurious practices of the Babylon Empire.  Nehemiah had to personally intervene with the usury systems instilled by some of the returning Jews.  It appears that a small group of Jews with wealth, had confiscated, by interest fees, many farms, lands, and houses.

Specifically, Nehemiah had to rid Judea of its usurious banking practice. Neh. 5:1-5 says,

1 Now there was a great outcry of the people and of their wives against their Jewish brothers. 2 For there were those who said, “We, our sons and our daughters, are many; therefore let us get grain that we may eat and live.” 3 And there were others who said, “We are mortgaging our fields, our vineyards, and our houses that we might get grain because of the famine.” 4 Also there were those who said, “We have borrowed money for the king’s tax on our fields and our vineyards. 5 And now our flesh is like the flesh of our brothers, our children like their children. Yet behold, we are forcing our sons and our daughters to be slaves, and some of our daughters are forced into bondage already, and we are helpless because our fields and vineyard belong to others.”

The Jews had learned to loan money at interest during their stay in Babylon, and even though they had gone out of Babylon, it was more difficult to get Babylon out of them. The practice of usury, then, is presented to us as the example of lawlessness that had to be corrected before Nehemiah could rebuild the wall in the next chapter.

In Nehemiah’s day, the people were being enslaved by interest-bearing loans, which was unlawful (Deut. 23:19). A famine had struck the land, and they were unable to repay their debts (Neh. 5:3).

This practice of usuary was practiced by various Jews throughout history.  The Jews in England established banking systems which led to the Rothschild’s dominant banking system within Europe.  This spawned the Federal Reserve system in the USA.  Reports claim the Federal Reserve was put in place in nefarious means.  After this action the Central Banking system was spread to all parts of the world.

Someone may ask, “What is the problem with the Federal Reserve and other Central Banks?”

Once upon a time the money supply was printed and issued by the Federal government.  It was based on gold and silver that was owned and stored by the Federal government.  No money of any kind could be issued unless there was the exact amount of gold and silver to back it up.

Along came the Rothschild banking affiliates and forced a central banking system upon President Woodrow Wilson at a time when the majority of Congress was on vacation.  Rather than a currency based on gold and silver, the new currency was based on nothing and is known as fiat money.  The money was usuriously loaned to the government with interest.  The IRS (internal revenue system) was set up to collect money from the wages of Americans to pay the interest (later came additional taxes to pay for certain government expenditures).  Of course the interest was never fully paid and the Fed continued printing more money and loaning it to the government which would never be paid back.  That is the reason for the huge national deficit. 

From the Federal Reserve web site:
It was created by the Congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. The Federal Reserve was created on December 23, 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law.Nov 3, 2016.

The X-22 report, and several other sources, claim that Trump and the Patriots intent is to do away with the Federal Reserve.  This would allow the USA to print their own money which is in the Constitution.  It has been reported that many other countries are catching on to the truth and have similar plans.  Some claim that Russia has nationalized their once central bank which is under the Russian government’s control.

When gold became a commodity rather than money, President F Roosevelt, most likely an act of greed, issued an executive order claiming that personal ownership of gold was illegal and that it was to be returned to the government (at a low price point).

FDR's 1933 Gold Confiscation was a Bailout of the Federal Reserve Bank. 20,000 metric tons of gold were 'circulating naked' in 1933.” President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 1933 executive order outlawing the private ownership of gold in the United States was arguably unconstitutional.

The Bank of International Settlements loans money to many countries with interest and these countries are in as much debt as the USA.  This may be the One World plan to bankrupt the cultured civilized world to demand subservience to a so-called unified world government.

Because the Church discarded the law of God, many have come to sanctify theft in the name of Jesus. Because of this, we allowed the practice of usury in our modern banking system and thus, God put us into bondage to Mystery Babylon through the Federal Reserve Act, which put the entire nation and the Church itself into captivity.

And here we are in the midst of the magical money supply creation of Mystery, Babylon.

Monday, October 30, 2017

Strong Delusion & the Big Lie



STRONG DELUSION & THE BIG LIE

Paul writes in 2nd Thess. 2:11 that God will send people (His people?) a strong delusion or a working of error so that they should believe a lie (something that is inherently wrong) in the last days and prior to the return of Christ.  The Greek word translated as “delusion” is “plane”.  The results from several Greek dictionaries and word studies are given below if one cares to look them over.

2nd Thessalonians 2:2-12 is considered a major “antichrist” or the first beast of Revelation 13, passage for numerous commentators and prophecy students of the Scofield-dispensational group.  There have been various speculations concerning the “strong delusion” and the “lie” which will not be discussed at this time. 

With the possible exception of the Preterist group, almost all Christians (and some so-called Christians or non-Christians) will receive some version of this strong delusion.  The only Christians currently not affected are known as the Saints of the Most High, or the Elect also called the overcomers (those who have overcome the lies and deceptions and firmly believe in the power, authority, and the ultimate control of God).

2 Thessalonians 2:11 KJV  And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

2 Thessalonians 2:11 MLV  (11)  And because of this, God will send them a working of error, to this end, they may believe a lie;

The word “plane” translated as “strong delusion” in the KJV can also mean a straying from orthodox doctrine or as Jesus explained “one should take the narrow path, not the broad path of error”.  His actual words are given below and He emphasizes that “many” take the broad path or the easy street.

Matthew 7:13 KJV  Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction (ruin, loss, or perdition), and many there be which go in thereat:

Falling Away
The primary issue with “falling away” is that most Christians believe their doctrines are correct and those disagreeing with them are incorrect and are in the process of “falling away”.  No one can understand they are personally falling away because of their doctrines and beliefs until they are convinced by the Holy Spirit that their current doctrines are wrong or somewhat incorrect.

2 Thessalonians 2:3 KJV  Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;

When did the “falling away” spoken by Paul in this particular passage actually begin?  The answer is somewhere around 1948.

The word translated as “man” appears to be singular although the world occurs in other scriptures where it may include many people or all men and women.  Thus it can generically include all human individuals and in this instance designates a large number of both genders.

Usurpers and Betrayers
David, the king of Israel and a type of Christ, had his kingdom usurped by his son, Absolom.  David was betrayed by Ahithophel, who he once considered his friend.  David, Absolom, and Ahithophel is a story for another time, so we will move on.

In His first appearance as a manifestation of Judah, Jesus was constantly verbally attacked by the usurpers composed of the chief priests.  His betrayer was His friend, Judas, who is called the “son of perdition”.  The throne of Jesus as the Messiah of Judah and the King of the Kingdom was temporarily usurped by the chief priests.  We are now quickly approaching the second appearance of Jesus as a manifestation of Joseph and the conflict will be over the “birthright” promise given to Joseph by Jacob and then to Jacob’s sons, Ephraim and Manasseh.

The Modern Usurpers
Who are the current usurpers?  They are the same ones who usurped the throne of Jesus at His first appearance.  Having usurped the throne, Paul says in 2 Thessalonians 2:4, “he (or they) takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.” In other words, by denying Christ His rightful claim to the throne, they usurped the throne.

The chief priests during the first appearance of Christ usurped His throne and placed themselves in an actual temple structure.  After the resurrection of Jesus, the temple of God is now within every true believer with the Holy Spirit of God filling that temple.

The current people, calling themselves Jews, maintain they are God’s chosen people, and though there is not a physical building called a temple, they continue to insist the throne of God belongs to them.

The chief priests of 30 AD were most likely partly or fully Edomites and many in the modern state of Israel are still mixed-breed Edomites.  However, the majority of so-called Jews are Khazarians, whose ancestors were descendants of Japheth and converted to Judaism around 800 AD.  There may actually be some Semitic Judahites in Israel but it is not the Khazarians who are not descended from Shem, Abraham, Jacob, or any ancient Israelite.

Josephus: Antiquities of the Jews, XIII, ix, 1
Hyrcanus also took Dora, and Marissa, cities of Idumea, and subdued ALL the Idumeans, and permitted them to stay in that country if they would adopt the rite of circumcision, and make use of the laws of the Jews. And they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted. At which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.

The Khazarians from Eastern Europe and Russia who helped established the modern state of Israel through gang warfare originally considered calling the nation Judah.  Although this next statement may be a conspiracy theory, it is said the founders reckoned that calling the nation, Israel rather than Judah, and claiming to be the returning Israelites (which they are not), their status with the Christian church would improve immensely (which it did).  It is also said they were responsible for publishing a few commentaries stating their new concepts, including the funding for the Scofield Commentary Bible. 

They actually have no legal right to call themselves Israel, because no Jew or citizen of national Israel, is from any of the ten tribes of northern Israel.  They are mostly non-semitic Khazarians or Edomite mixed-breeds.

The Modern Betrayers
Now we get to the modern betrayers, as in more than one betrayer.  As explained above, this group consists of the majority of the Christian church with any knowledge of end-times prophecies.

First some background information.  Contrary to the popular opinion of this group there will be no one-world ruler called the “antichrist” or the beast.  There will be no physical “mark of the beast” in the form of a tattoo, badge, implant, or DNA manipulation.  The sea beast (popularly called the “antichrist”) is all past history as it concerns the Holy Roman Empire / the Catholic Church / and the Papacy ensconced in the Vatican, which came to an end in 1914.

The earth beast (the second beast), or false prophet, consists of the Rothschild instigated International Banking System, the Federal Reserve and its sisters, fiat currency, and usury.  This banking system along with the one-world government initiative, the Mid-East wars for the benefit of the Greater Israel Project is called Mystery, Babylon.  It is a 100 year extension of the beast systems (Babylon, Persia, Greece, Rome, the little horn) when the Greek Empire was denied that amount of time due to the actions and apostasy of Antiochus Epiphanes.  Mystery Babylon’s authority ended in 2014 which is 100 years after the end of the “little horn’s” authority ended in 1914 at the same time the Federal Reserve was enacted.  The Federal Reserve later enacted the Petrol-dollar which is a large part of the new Babylon.  The new “kings of the east”, Russia and China, are currently bringing an end to the Petrol-Dollar.

Again, Mystery Babylon’s authority ended in 2014 when authority was conceded to the Saints of the Most High.  We are now seeing the results of its demise in the daily news (not the fake news).

So, exactly who are the modern Betrayers?  Actually you should know by now because I have already given you a major hint.  It is everyone who didn’t believe a word I wrote in the above section titled, The Modern Usurpers.

If you believe that modern Israel are the ancestors of Old Israel and consist of the twelve tribes (or even one tribe); if you believe the Jews are the “apple of God’s eye” when the majority are not even of Hebrew descent; if you believe you will be raptured prior to the onset of the so-called “antichrist” while the Jews do their Temple thing and rule the world after the “antichrist” is defeated; if you believe there is a future fulfillment of the 70th week of Daniel; then you are a Betrayer.  You have received the strong delusion and have believed the LIE.

Matthew 23:24 NET  Blind guides! You strain out a gnat yet swallow a camel!

The “son of perdition” is now an entire group of people who help and praise the usurpers (can you say John Hagee as a primary culprit?). The birthright and the name of “Israel” were given to the sons of Joseph in the book of Genesis and not to Khazarians and Edomites.  The Edomites were given their chance to bring forth the fruits of the Kingdom and they have failed.  Israel, Jerusalem, and the Gog/Magog Khazarians will be destroyed.

A Reprint from a Current Post Comment
I fully comprehend that the majority of people reading this article, or another one I have written, will not agree and never believe the information that is presented until the return of Jesus Christ.  Of course there will be a small number of readers who will say to themselves, “perhaps this article makes a few good points,” and one or two may perhaps be convinced to a certain degree.

However, it is not my goal to make advocates or to convince anyone of anything, because I know that particular target is nearly impossible to achieve at this point in history.  My actual purpose is to place a vague thought in one’s mind, because if you live long enough (i.e. which will be a short time period) perhaps you will recall reading this article or remember the information that was given and you will not be further deluded as to the actual events that will soon be occurring.


Vincent’s Word Studies
Strong delusion (ἐνέργειαν πλάνης)
Rev., literally and correctly, a working of error. See on working 2Th_2:9. The phrase is unique in N.T. It means an active power of misleading. For πλάνη error which shows itself in action, see on 1Th_2:3.

Strong’s
planē  plan'-ay
Feminine of G4108 (as abstraction); objectively fraudulence; subjectively a straying from orthodoxy or piety: - deceit, to deceive, delusion, error.

Thayer Greek Definitions:
1) a wandering, a straying about
1a) one led astray from the right way, roams hither and thither
2) metaphorically
2a) mental straying
2a1) error, wrong opinion relative to morals or religion
2b) error which shows itself in action, a wrong mode of acting
2c) error, that which leads into error, deceit or fraud

Word Study Dictionary
(I) Delusion, false judgment or opinion (1Th_2:3; 2Th_2:11; Sept.: Jer_23:17).
(II) In an active sense, deceit, fraud, seduction to error and sin (Mat_27:64; Eph_4:14; 2Pe_3:17; 1Jn_4:6 used of a spirit of error, a deceiving spirit, a teacher who seeks to seduce, deception, fraud; Sept.: Pro_14:8).
(III) Of conduct meaning perverseness, wickedness, sin