SELECTION OF THE LAMBS on
APRIL 15
By Dr. Stephen Jones // Blog Posted on 4-19-2019
PART
1
Beginning
early in the morning while it was yet dark, reports say, a fire broke out in
the spire of the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris, France, burning all day and
destroying the spire and roof of the cathedral. Apparently, the main structure
of the cathedral was not overly damaged, and so they are now vowing to rebuild.
The
spire had been undergoing a multi-million dollar renovation.
Some
suspect arson, because many churches have been attacked recently around the
world.
Until
governments repent and renounce their right to lie to the public, we will
probably not know for sure about the origins of these arsons.
April 15 Selection of the Lambs
April
15 was one of our watch dates this year, as it is the 10th day of
the 1st month on the Hebrew calendar—the day that the lambs are
selected for Passover, and also the day that Joshua led Israel into the
Promised Land.
It
was also the day after Palm Sunday. That Monday morning, according to Matthew’s
account, Jesus cursed the fig tree.
On
Palm Sunday, Jesus came into Jerusalem on the donkey (Matthew
21:8-11). He then went straight to the temple where He cast out the money
changers (Matthew 21:12-13). That evening, or possibly
the next day, the chief priests met to condemn Jesus to death. They selected
Him as their Passover lamb without realizing it.
The
next day (Matthew
21:17, 18, 19) He cursed the fig tree, declaring it to be
forever fruitless, although it was to come back to life in the latter days long
enough to bring forth more leaves
(Matthew
24:32).
The
fig tree has indeed remained fruitless, as Jesus prophesied. The tree must
again immediately wither away from the roots up, as at the first occasion, in
order for the people themselves (individuals) to be set free from the bondage
of the state itself. As long as they have confidence that the Israeli state
will bear fruit for the Kingdom, they will remain blind to the truth, and that
blindness will keep them bound by the curse.
Esau Usurps Nimrod’s Kingdom
In
yesterday’s study of the Judges, I showed how 1948 was 8 x 414 years from
Israel’s first captivity to the king of Mesopotamia (i.e., Babylon) in Judges
3:8. This time period was patterned after this eight-year captivity. The
pattern of Babylon’s fall occurred 2 x 414 years later in 537 B.C. The rest of
that cycle, another 6 periods of 414 years, came to 1948.
That
was the year that Babylon should have fallen, and it did, but not in an obvious
manner. It fell according to the pattern set by Esau himself, who killed Nimrod
and took his garment of skin—the symbol of the divine right to rule.
This
story is told not in Scripture but in the book of Jasher, chapter 27.
4 And on a certain day Esau went in the field to
hunt, and he found Nimrod walking in the wilderness with his two men… 7
And Nimrod and two of his men that were with him came to the place where they
were, when Esau started suddenly from his lurking place, and drew his sword,
and hastened and ran to Nimrod and cut off his head…. 10 And when
Esau saw the mighty men of Nimrod coming at a distance, he fled, and thereby
escaped; and Esau took the valuable garments of Nimrod, which Nimrod’s father
had bequeathed to Nimrod, and with which Nimrod prevailed over the whole land,
and he ran and concealed them in his house. 11 And Esau took those
garments and ran into the city on account of Nimrod’s men, and he came unto his
father’s house wearied and exhausted from fight, and he was ready to die
through grief when he approached his brother Jacob and sat before him. 12
And he said unto his brother Jacob, behold I shall die this day, and wherefore
then do I want the birthright?
We
see, then, that Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for what he thought might be
his last meal. He may also have been motivated by the fact that he now
possessed the garment of skin that his father had given him. That garment,
according to Jasher, had been stolen earlier from Noah, while Noah was drunk (Genesis
9:20, 21). Jasher says that Ham and Canaan stripped
him of his garment, which was how Noah came to be naked.
That
garment, of course, was the one given to Adam in Genesis
3:21. It was a replacement for the spiritual garments of immortality which
Paul discusses in 2 Corinthians 5:1-4. The garment of skin,
then, came to represent the divine right to rule, and when Nimrod put them on
later, he was able to rule the earth in the original pattern of the rise of
Babylon, Nimrod’s capital.
Thus,
by killing Nimrod and stealing his garment, Esau was able to usurp Nimrod’s
claim upon the earth. I believe that this set the pattern for what happened in
1948. The descendants of Esau usurped the power of Babylon and thereby took the
birthright represented in ancient times by the garment of skin.
The Laws of Birthright Transfer
There
were actually two relevant stories involved in this birthright transfer. The
first is the sale of the birthright in the story above, which portrays how Esau
came to receive the symbol of the birthright. The second is when Jacob later
pretended to be Esau in order to get the blessing from Isaac. That was a case
of identity theft, which caused Isaac to prophesy that Jacob would have to give
the “dominion” back to Esau at some point in the future. Esau would have to
receive justice in the divine court on account of Jacob’s unlawful way of
obtaining the birthright.
So
in 1948 the British (Brit, or beriyth,
“Covenant” and ish, “man”),
whose flag is called Union JACK (Jacob), gave the birthright back to Esau’s
descendants. The British had been in control of Palestine since the end of
World War 1 in 1917, so that they could fulfill the prophetic type as
representatives of Jacob in the divine court. In giving the birthright back to
Esau in 1948, the heirs of Esau were able to take also the birthright name, Israel.
Ironically,
just as Jacob had stolen Esau’s identity to obtain the birthright many years
ago, so also did the law of God allow Esau steal Jacob’s identity, calling
itself Israel. In other words, the judgment fit the crime. It was an “eye for
eye” (Exodus
21:24), for in both cases, it was made possible only by blindness. First
Isaac was blind (Genesis 27:1), and in 1948 the Church was
blind, thinking that the Jews were Israel and that the Israeli state was truly
the Israel of prophecy that would soon “fill the
whole world with fruit” (Isaiah
27:6).
But
Jesus said that the fig tree of Judah would never again bring forth fruit, even
though they would later bring forth leaves in 1948.
The
legal mess, created by Jacob’s panic and lack of faith in Genesis 27, was
resolved in 1948 when Jacob was commanded to give the birthright back to Esau.
Esau had to be given time to prove himself unworthy of the birthright, for the
law forbids a man from passing over his firstborn son without some lawful cause
(Deuteronomy
21:16, 17). It is only when he persists as a “stubborn son” (Deuteronomy
21:18) or some other unlawful act that he can lawfully be stripped of the
birthright, as we see later in the case of Reuben (1
Chronicles 5:1).
So
we must view the two stories in Genesis together. On the one hand, Esau killed
Nimrod again in 1948 and usurped his garment (power of the birthright). On the
other hand, from the perspective of the divine court, Jacob was commanded to
give the birthright back to Esau in 1948 in order to give Esau time to prove
himself unworthy.
In
the end, the birthright will go to the overcomers. Daniel calls them “the saints of the Most High,” who
receive the dominion at the end of the final beast (Daniel
7:22 KJV). The New Testament defines this term more specifically in terms
of those who qualify for the first resurrection (Revelation
20:4, 5, 6). These are the true Israelites, not merely
in name or by genealogy but in actual calling.
These
overcomers are pictured in Othniel, whose name means “the power of God,” but in
the context of the other judges, it refers to the voice of God. His voice is the expression of His power
to set people free from bondage. These are the overcomers, “the saints of the
Most High.”
SELECTING THE LAMBS ON APRIL
15, part 2
Nearly
a year ago (2018) the Israeli state reached its 70th birthday since
1948. I believe that this was sufficient time for Esau-Israel to prove itself
unworthy and as a “stubborn son,” so that it would be lawful to strip him of
the birthright. I wrote and spoke about this last year.
In
my view, the Israeli state is now vulnerable to the judgment of the law and
only awaits the final execution of judgment. They cannot be expected to give up
the birthright peacefully, for they do not agree with the sentence of the law
and remain (nationally) in a state of rebellion against Jesus Christ. Neither
have they brought forth the fruit that is required of those who hold the
dominion.
In
one sense, Babylon fell to Esau in 1948 after 8 x 414 years (since Judges 3:8).
But Babylon has continued under its new rulers to the present time, because the
succession of beast empires had to continue for its full “seven times” (2,520
years), as specified in the law (Leviticus
26:18). So the final 70 years of beast dominion involved Esau’s dominion,
as prophesied by Isaac in Genesis 27:40 KJV.
There
are many factors in Mystery Babylon, all of which must be taken into account
when we discern the fall of Babylon as a whole. The stone hitting the image (Daniel 2:35)
on its feet will grind the entire image to powder—not just the final
manifestation of the beast. In Matthew
21:43, 44 Jesus warned the chief priests not to sit on the feet of
this image, that is, not to become the rulers of Babylon in the time of the
end. They did not heed His warning, of course, and so the stone that the
builders rejected will fall on them when it rises to destroy the kingdoms of
men.
April
15, 2019 appears to be one sign of the fall of Babylon, though not directly
relating to the Israeli state. The fire destroying Notre Dame in Paris appears
to speak more toward the Roman Church—or, more specifically, to the Templars
who built that cathedral 850 years ago. This Cathedral was built in honor of
“Our Lady,” supposedly to honor the Virgin Mary. However, the Templars were
Gnostics and dedicated it to another “Lady,” Mary Magdalene.
For
this reason we should look at the fiery destruction as not only a judgment
against the Roman Church (the “little horn” extension of the Roman beast), but
also specifically against the very powerful Gnostic faction within the Roman
Church, which, I believe, resides chiefly with the so-called “Black Pope,” the
Jesuit General. Pope Francis is a Jesuit as well, which raises an interesting
question as to who is really in charge, the White Pope or the Black Pope.
Financial Dominion through
Debt
Laurence
Gardner tells us in his book, Lost Secrets of the Sacred Ark, page 223,
that Notre Dame was built with the wealth from Jerusalem that the Templars
found in a cavern under the Temple Mount (1118-1123). The foundation stone was
laid by Pope Alexander in 1163. Gardner writes also on page 222,
“When
news spread of the Templars’ incredible find, the Knights became revered by all
and, notwithstanding their Jerusalem wealth, large donations were received from
far and wide… Being so well funded, the Templars established the first
international banking network, becoming financiers for the Levant and for
practically every throne in Europe.”
One
main Templar banking center was in Venice, whose system of banking was later
copied in the City of London. In the early 1300’s the Templars were suppressed,
and they went underground. This was a huge setback for them, but most of their
wealth remained intact and influenced the political and economic policies of
Europe.
Centuries
later, the Rothschilds refined the Templar banking system and brought the world
into debt bondage. The Vatican Bank established its own bank in 1942 in order
to compete with the financial powers of the day. Having their own bank ensured
privacy, so that they were able to launder money and finance countless illicit
activities, which no pope has been able to stop. He who controls the money
rules the organization. The Vatican Bank scandal still haunts the Roman Church
to this day.
The Façade King
Yesterday,
while Notre Dame was burning, we were having a prayer meeting and a divine
court session. We saw, arising from the basement under the cathedral, an entity
identified only as “The Façade King.” Façade comes from the Latin word facia,
“face,” and refers to a front wall, but it also means “a superficial or false
outward appearance.”
In
discussing this further among ourselves, we discerned that this was the Black
Pope, who wears a façade. His façade is the White Pope, the “face” of the Roman
Church who has the appearance of power but who is actually just a front man for
the Black Pope. The current Black Pope (Jesuit General), elected in October
2016, is Arturo Sosa, a Venezuelan.
In
dealing with the “Façade King” arising from the spiral staircase under Notre
Dame, we had a direct encounter with him and talked to him by the spirit face
to face. He was resistant to the truth, being blinded by the light, refusing to
open his eyes, but Jesus surprised us by leading him away to draw him by love
to the knowledge of the truth. We do not know the end of that story yet as of
this writing, but we believe that love always wins in the end. We believe that
this is part of the preparation for the outpouring of the Spirit, at which time
the bondage of Jesuit brainwashing is broken, and they are able to bow to the
real Jesus, not their self-constructed image of Jesus who leads men into
bondage.
The
Roman Church is entangled with the Gnostic successors of the Templars as well
as the financial beast described in Revelation
13:11-18, Babylon, and even Esau. So it is difficult to distinguish them or
understand fully how each relates to other aspects of the beast.
Children Set Free
Also
on April 15, once we dealt with the Façade King, an enormous number of children
(spiritual in form) came running to us in the divine court, having been set
free. These were children who had been sacrificed and many even cannibalized in
satanic ceremonies. They were healed and drawn by Jesus Himself, as per Matthew
19:14, where He said,
14 … “Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me;
for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”
We
understood that these were the real “lambs” that Jesus was selecting on April
15, 2019. They were among the martyrs pictured in Revelation
6:9-11 as lambs whose blood (soul) was poured out under the altar of
sacrifice. The blood of all the martyrs was shed by evil men, but God treats
them as sacrificial lambs, holy and acceptable sacrifices unto God (Romans 12:1).
During
our prayer session, we learned that there was some sort of connection between
Paris and London. It was pictured as a tunnel, but we do not know if this is
literal or spiritual. Even so, this revelation pointed to a connection between
the two cities insofar as the sacrifice of children was concerned. We also saw
an altar of Mithra (or Mithras) half-way between the two cities.
In
the closing ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics, they pictured the world on
fire with a phoenix rising out of the ashes. Above it was an altar to Mithras,
which everyone missed unless they zoomed in on it and looked at it closely. (Mithra
is Persian; Mithras is Greek.)
The
point is that this was at the London Olympic games. A local friend named
James saw this and discerned the altar of Mithras at the time. James emailed me
the picture with this comment:
“Stephen, I was to pray over the masses and shine
the true light. 2012 London Olympics. Look at the top of the stadium and
you'll see the altar of Mithras. The world was in flames and the Phoenix rising
out of the ashes. We saw the ashes today.”
So
yesterday, when we discerned the altar of Mithras connecting Paris with London,
we made the connection between the burning of Notre Dame and the London Olympic
ceremony of Mithras. Our understanding is that children have been sacrificed on
the altar of Mithras and that this has inspired a lot of child sacrifice in
human trafficking.
In
connection to this, we encountered Marina Abramovic, which we saw with a snake
around her. We found her picture later:
Marina
is famous for her “spirit cooking,” in which she simulates cannibalism by
serving food in the shape of children or people in general. Such a practice is
legal, so it is what she does openly, but such things are designed to train
(and desensitize) people to do the real thing in secret.
We
gave Marina an opportunity to repent, but she was totally unrepentant and
almost like a zombie, having no feeling or remorse for doing what she does. We
thus brought judgment upon her, committing her to Jesus to impose whatever
sentence was appropriate.
The
bottom line is that Jesus selected a large number of children as lambs for His
Kingdom, healing them, comforting them, and bringing them to Himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment